Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1256

Introduced
1/30/24  
Report Pass
2/20/24  
Introduced
1/30/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Report Pass
2/20/24  
Engrossed
3/7/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Engrossed
3/7/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Passed
4/16/24  
Passed
4/16/24  
Chaptered
4/16/24  

Caption

Pioneers' home; miners' hospital; continuation

Impact

The legislation ensures that the Arizona pioneers' home and the miners' hospital remain operational until the specified termination date. This is crucial for current residents who rely on the services offered by these institutions. The bill indicates a commitment by the state to address the needs of individuals with disabilities, particularly those associated with mining. By instituting a clear termination date, the state also sets a timeline for potential restructuring or the development of alternative services for these populations.

Summary

Senate Bill 1256 focuses on the continuation of the Arizona pioneers' home and the state hospital for miners with disabilities by modifying existing sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The bill specifically repeals section 41-3024.12 and adds section 41-3032.12, setting the termination date for these institutions on July 1, 2032, with a subsequent repeal on January 1, 2033. The overarching purpose of the bill is to ensure ongoing services for long-term residents and miners facing disabilities within the state of Arizona.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB1256 appears to be supportive among legislators who emphasize the need for continued care for vulnerable populations. Most discussions tend to highlight the importance of these institutions in providing specialized services to individuals with disabilities. However, there may also be concerns about the implications of the termination date and what it means for the future planning of services, which reflects a cautious but hopeful approach among stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of the termination date, which could lead to uncertainty for residents and their families regarding future care options. Critics might argue that setting a definitive end date without a concrete plan for transition could leave vulnerable individuals at risk. The bill does not detail follow-up measures or alternative provisions that will be put in place after the termination, raising questions about the adequacy of continuing care and support for the affected populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.