Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1403

Introduced
1/30/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Introduced
1/30/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  

Caption

Designated countries; land ownership; prohibition

Impact

The enactment of SB1403 will significantly alter the landscape of property laws in Arizona by limiting foreign investment in real estate. This legislation is predicated on concerns regarding national security, particularly focusing on protecting critical infrastructure and agricultural assets from potential foreign espionage and sabotage. Importantly, existing property holdings by foreign nationals will be grandfathered in, allowing those who already own property to maintain their interests under specific conditions.

Summary

Senate Bill 1403 aims to restrict land ownership in Arizona by foreign principals from designated countries, defined as those identified by U.S. national intelligence as posing a risk to national security. The bill prohibits these foreign entities from directly or indirectly purchasing or owning substantial interests in real property within the state. The Attorney General is tasked with enforcing this provision and will initiate actions in court if violations are suspected. Courts would have the authority to divest illegal interests and manage the sale of the affected properties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1403 seems to be strongly supportive among proponents who argue it is a necessary measure to safeguard Arizona's security and interests from adverse foreign influences, particularly from nations perceived as threats. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential chilling effects on foreign investment and the implications for property rights and international relations.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB1403 include debates over its necessity and implications for local economies. Supporters argue it is crucial for national security, while opponents raise issues about potential discrimination against foreign investors that could hinder economic growth. The bill’s provisions also highlight the balance between ensuring safety and maintaining property rights, raising questions about how far the state should go in regulating ownership based on nationality.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI HB1965

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

HI SB149

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

LA SB359

Provides for civil forfeiture reform. (8/1/22)

CA AB2584

Single-family residential real property: corporate entity: ownership.

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

HI HB126

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

AZ HB2324

Forfeiture; digital assets; reserve fund

TX HB1743

Relating to the holding or acquisition of an interest in real property by or on behalf of certain foreign individuals or entities; establishing an agricultural intelligence office; creating a criminal offense.