Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2291

Introduced
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Engrossed
2/20/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Enrolled
4/1/25  
Passed
4/7/25  
Chaptered
4/7/25  

Caption

Opioids; containers; labeling; requirements; repeal

Impact

The proposed changes in HB2291 would have significant implications for the handling of controlled substances in Arizona. By mandating that each prescription order for a schedule II opioid be transmitted electronically, the bill aims to modernize and secure the prescription process. This move is designed to enhance tracking, reduce the potential for prescription fraud, and improve the overall safety and accessibility of opioid medications. Under this bill, details such as the prescriber’s registration number and specific record-keeping requirements are clarified, aiming to bolster compliance among pharmacies and practitioners.

Summary

House Bill 2291 focuses on the regulations surrounding opioids, specifically addressing the labeling requirements and the prescription processes for controlled substances as outlined in section 36-2525 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. This bill proposes amendments to existing statutes to streamline and clarify the prescription ordering and dispensing of controlled substances, particularly schedule II opioids. The amendments also involve stipulations regarding verbal authorizations for pharmacists and how prescriptions should be recorded and maintained.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2291 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies focused on mitigating the opioid crisis. Advocates assert that the modernization of prescription capabilities and stricter labeling will help safeguard against misuse while facilitating better patient management. Conversely, there may be concerns raised regarding the additional burdens placed on medical providers and the system's ability to adapt to electronic prescribing mandates, with the fear that technical issues could hinder access to necessary medications.

Contention

While there is general support for the bill's intent to address the opioid epidemic through stricter control and regulation, some points of contention may arise. Critics might argue that the requirements for electronic prescriptions could be challenging for certain providers, particularly in rural areas where technology infrastructure is lacking. Furthermore, the potential financial implications for pharmacies needing to update their systems to comply with new electronic prescription mandates may also be debated.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1254

Opioids; containers; labeling; requirements; repeal

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CT SB00135

An Act Concerning Revisions To Pharmacy And Drug Control Statutes.

CT HB07052

An Act Preventing Prescription Opioid Diversion And Abuse.

CT HB07159

An Act Addressing Opioid Use.

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.

TX HB2174

Relating to controlled substance prescriptions and reimbursement for treatment for certain substance use disorders; authorizing a fee.