Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1235

Introduced
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Engrossed
3/5/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  

Caption

Health profession regulatory boards; membership

Impact

If enacted, this legislation would revise how health profession regulatory boards operate, maintaining that at least fifty percent of the board members should be individuals who have never had their licenses revoked or suspended. This is intended to ensure that experienced professionals oversee regulatory processes, which may enhance the credibility and effectiveness of health boards. Furthermore, by requiring background checks on prospective members, the bill aims to preserve the integrity of the boards involved in health care licensing.

Summary

Senate Bill 1235 seeks to amend multiple sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes related to health profession regulatory boards, focusing primarily on the composition and operational guidelines of these boards. The bill aims to ensure that the boards consist of a diverse representation while emphasizing the necessity for public members who have no connections to the healthcare industry. It also specifies the appointment processes for board members along with qualifications, terms of service, and compensation.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB 1235 appears to be supportive among healthcare professionals and advocates for public health regulation, as it focuses on strengthening the regulatory environment for health professions in Arizona. There are, however, concerns regarding the effectiveness of having an adequate number of qualified members, especially in terms of balancing public representation with professional oversight.

Contention

Some points of contention arise from the bill's emphasis on public representation, which could lead to discussions about the qualifications and experiences of public members versus licensed health professionals. There may be debates over how effectively public members can contribute to complex regulatory decisions compared to professionals who possess industry-specific knowledge and experience. The tension between balancing public input and ensuring expertise on regulatory boards may become a critical area of focus during legislative discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2027

Behavior analysts; regulatory board

AZ HB2028

Genetic counselors; board; licensure

AZ SB1125

Psychologists; prescribing authority

AZ HB2846

Chiropractic board; regulation; unprofessional conduct

AZ HB2876

Chiropractic; specialties; business entities

AZ HB2031

Boards and commissions; state departments

AZ SB1588

Naturopathic physicians; chiropractors; board; conduct

AZ SB1396

Pharmacy board; duties; regulation