California 2009-2010 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB895

Introduced
1/25/10  
Introduced
1/25/10  
Refer
3/3/10  
Refer
3/11/10  
Refer
3/11/10  
Refer
4/6/10  
Report Pass
4/13/10  
Report Pass
4/13/10  
Refer
4/13/10  
Refer
4/13/10  
Engrossed
5/3/10  
Engrossed
5/3/10  
Report Pass
6/15/10  
Report Pass
6/15/10  
Refer
6/15/10  
Refer
6/15/10  
Report Pass
6/17/10  
Report Pass
6/17/10  
Enrolled
6/21/10  
Enrolled
6/21/10  
Chaptered
6/22/10  
Chaptered
6/22/10  
Passed
6/22/10  

Caption

Vehicles: driver's license: suspension.

Impact

The potential impact of SB895 on state laws revolves around the amendment of existing statutes that govern the specific circumstances leading to driver's license suspensions. Should the bill pass, it would define particular behaviors or incidents that trigger license suspensions, thereby creating a more systematic approach to enforcement. This could lead to a significant shift in how traffic violations are prosecuted and could impact the way public safety is managed on the roads.

Summary

SB895 aims to establish clearer regulations regarding the suspension of driver's licenses in the state. The bill seeks to address issues related to driver accountability and the conditions under which licenses may be suspended. Proponents claim that by creating standardized procedures, this legislation will enhance road safety and ensure that only qualified individuals operate vehicles. This is particularly relevant in light of rising concerns about traffic violations and associated dangers on public roads.

Sentiment

The general sentiment concerning SB895 appears to be positive among supporters, which include law enforcement and public safety advocates. They view the bill as a necessary measure to provide clarity and consistency in the handling of driver's licenses. However, there are notable dissenting opinions, particularly from civil rights advocates who warn that overly stringent regulations might disproportionately affect low-income individuals or those without access to legal resources to contest suspensions.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between public safety and personal freedoms. Critics argue that the measures proposed in SB895 could lead to excessive punishment for minor infractions, potentially creating a cycle of poverty for those unable to regain their driving privileges. The legislative discussion around the bill highlights the complexity of enforcing safety without infringing on individual rights, making it a focal point of debate among stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.