California Assembly Bill AB1021

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/17
• Refer: 3/6/17
• Report Pass: 3/27/17
• Refer: 3/29/17
• Report Pass: 5/10/17
• Engrossed: 5/18/17
• Refer: 5/18/17
• Refer: 6/1/17
• Report Pass: 6/14/17
• Refer: 6/14/17
• Enrolled: 7/17/17
• Chaptered: 7/31/17
• Passed: 7/31/17

Caption

In-home supportive services: application.

Impact

The bill introduces additional duties for county agencies, classifying it as a state-mandated local program. This designation means that counties are required to accommodate these changes, which could result in increased administrative tasks and necessary adjustments to current processes for handling benefit applications. The California Constitution ensures that the state will reimburse local agencies for the costs incurred due to these mandates, providing some level of financial support to implement the new protocols.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1021, enacted in California, aims to enhance the accessibility of the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program for qualified aged, blind, and disabled individuals. By mandating that each county human services agency accept applications by telephone, facsimile, in-person, and, where feasible, by electronic means, the bill represents a significant step towards providing greater access to essential home support services. This is crucial for enabling individuals to remain in their homes, thus supporting their autonomy and quality of life.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1021 appears to be generally positive, with bipartisan support reflected in the voting records. The broad acceptance of the bill highlights a collective recognition of the importance of making vital services more accessible to vulnerable populations. Overall, legislators viewed the bill as a necessary update that reflects the changing needs of constituents who depend on in-home support.

Contention

While there is substantial support for AB 1021, potential points of contention focus on the resources required by counties to implement the necessary changes. Some concerns may arise regarding whether the reimbursement from the state will sufficiently cover the increased costs of processing applications in a more accessible manner. Additionally, the feasibility of electronic application processes may vary by county, leading to discussions about equity and resource allocation in different regions of California.