California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1021

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/6/17  
Report Pass
3/27/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Enrolled
7/17/17  
Chaptered
7/31/17  

Caption

In-home supportive services: application.

Impact

The bill introduces additional duties for county agencies, classifying it as a state-mandated local program. This designation means that counties are required to accommodate these changes, which could result in increased administrative tasks and necessary adjustments to current processes for handling benefit applications. The California Constitution ensures that the state will reimburse local agencies for the costs incurred due to these mandates, providing some level of financial support to implement the new protocols.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1021, enacted in California, aims to enhance the accessibility of the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program for qualified aged, blind, and disabled individuals. By mandating that each county human services agency accept applications by telephone, facsimile, in-person, and, where feasible, by electronic means, the bill represents a significant step towards providing greater access to essential home support services. This is crucial for enabling individuals to remain in their homes, thus supporting their autonomy and quality of life.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1021 appears to be generally positive, with bipartisan support reflected in the voting records. The broad acceptance of the bill highlights a collective recognition of the importance of making vital services more accessible to vulnerable populations. Overall, legislators viewed the bill as a necessary update that reflects the changing needs of constituents who depend on in-home support.

Contention

While there is substantial support for AB 1021, potential points of contention focus on the resources required by counties to implement the necessary changes. Some concerns may arise regarding whether the reimbursement from the state will sufficiently cover the increased costs of processing applications in a more accessible manner. Additionally, the feasibility of electronic application processes may vary by county, leading to discussions about equity and resource allocation in different regions of California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2241

Public social services: reporting and verification.

CA SB471

Subpoenas: service.

CA AB991

Public social services: reporting and verification.

HI HB907

Relating To Telehealth.

HI HB384

Relating To Telehealth.

CA AB292

Primary elections: ballots.

TN HB0321

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 1; Title 2; Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 20; Title 22; Title 24; Title 31; Title 33; Title 36; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69 and Title 71, relative to electronic transmissions.

TN SB0329

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 1; Title 2; Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 20; Title 22; Title 24; Title 31; Title 33; Title 36; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69 and Title 71, relative to electronic transmissions.