California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1022

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/13/17  
Enrolled
9/13/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  

Caption

Information technology: Technology Recovery Plans: inventory.

Impact

The bill aims to strengthen compliance by requiring state agencies to regularly update their Technology Recovery Plans and report their adherence to new cybersecurity standards. This systematic approach is designed to protect critical infrastructure information and ensure that state agencies are prepared for potential cybersecurity incidents, thus enhancing overall public safety. Additionally, it extends the requirement to local entities receiving state funds, fostering a comprehensive state-wide cybersecurity strategy.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1022, introduced by Irwin, seeks to enhance the cybersecurity framework for state agencies in California by amending certain sections of the Government Code. The bill mandates that each state agency provide an inventory of all critical infrastructure controls and their associated assets as part of their Technology Recovery Plan. This effort emphasizes the need for a robust strategy to address cybersecurity threats and incident response standards in light of increasing vulnerabilities in public sector technology systems.

Sentiment

Legislative discussion around AB 1022 has been predominantly supportive, with recognition of the growing importance of cybersecurity in government operations. There is a strong sentiment that the proposed measures will enhance the protection of sensitive information and critical infrastructure within the state. However, some concerns have surfaced regarding the confidentiality of the information required under the bill, especially regarding public access to records related to state agency cybersecurity strategies.

Contention

Notably, the legislation includes provisions to prevent public disclosure of specific reports and plans related to cybersecurity strategies, which has raised questions about transparency and accountability. Critics argue that while the intent of protecting critical infrastructure is vital, the approach may limit public oversight and access to information regarding how state agencies manage and secure essential services. Balancing cybersecurity needs with the public's right to information is poised to be a central point of discussion as the bill is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2748

Election infrastructure: independent security assessments.

CA AB1352

Independent information security assessments: Military Department: local educational agencies.

CA AB1242

Information security.

CA AB2669

Information security.

CA AB1359

Cybersecurity: critical infrastructure business: breach notification.

CA AB2135

Information security.

CA AB979

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: artificial intelligence.

CA SB833

Critical infrastructure: automated decision systems: human oversight.