California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1067

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
5/4/17  
Report Pass
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
5/15/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Enrolled
6/20/17  
Chaptered
7/10/17  
Chaptered
7/10/17  
Passed
7/10/17  

Caption

State nut: almond, walnut, pistachio, and pecan.

Impact

The inclusion of these nuts as state symbols does not alter existing laws or regulations; however, it highlights the state's agricultural contributions and aims to foster a sense of pride among residents and stakeholders in the nut farming industry. The almond industry alone contributes approximately $4 billion to California's economy and has created over 100,000 jobs, indicating the significant role that nut farming plays in local economies, particularly in regions with high unemployment rates, such as the Central Valley.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1067, introduced by Assemblymember Gray, aims to designate the almond, walnut, pistachio, and pecan as the official state nut of California. This bill establishes a symbolic recognition of these specific nuts, which hold significant agricultural and economic importance within the state. California is renowned for its production of these nuts, leading the global market in almonds and pistachios, with walnuts representing a substantial share as well. The bill aligns with the state’s tradition of declaring official state symbols, promoting California's agricultural heritage and identity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1067 has generally been positive, with strong support from agricultural organizations and representatives who see value in promoting California's agrarian identity. The bill illustrates the state's acknowledgment of the important cultural and economic contributions made by nut farming. While there may be limited contention surrounding this bill due to its symbolic nature, some skepticism could be found from those who argue that more pressing agricultural issues warrant legislative attention. Nevertheless, the sentiment remains largely supportive.

Contention

One point of contention may arise from the call for representation among other agricultural products that are also significant to California’s economy. Critics might argue that the bill trivializes legislative focus by prioritizing honorary designations over substantive agricultural policy changes. However, given the overwhelmingly positive legislative support, as evidenced by a unanimous vote, it appears that any opposition is minimal.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1086

Off-highway vehicular recreation: Carnegie State Vehicular Recreation Area: Alameda-Tesla Expansion Area.

CA AR19

Relative to California Agriculture Day.

CA AR74

Relative to California Agriculture Day.

CA SR28

Relative to California Agriculture Day.

CA SR73

Relative to California Agriculture Day.

CA AR93

Relative to Saka Nakodar Day.

CA AB778

Institutional purchasers: purchase of California-grown agricultural food products.

CA AJR34

Agricultural workers: labor shortages.