California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1137

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Report Pass
6/6/17  
Report Pass
6/6/17  
Refer
6/6/17  
Refer
6/6/17  
Refer
6/26/17  
Refer
6/26/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/13/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Passed
10/14/17  

Caption

Housing developments: pet permissibility.

Impact

By requiring the Department of Housing and Community Development to enable pet ownership in newly financed housing developments, this bill aims to enhance the living experience for residents, particularly those who are elderly or require supportive services. It permits residents who may often feel isolated from their communities to experience companionship through pets, while also maintaining compliance with applicable public health and animal control laws. This change could foster more inclusive housing policies, catering to the needs of pet owners in residential situations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1137, known as the Pet Friendly Housing Act of 2017, establishes provisions allowing residents in certain housing developments to keep pets within their dwellings. This bill specifically targets housing developments financed under the Zenovich-Moscone-Chacon Housing and Home Finance Act, and it mandates that such developments must permit residents to maintain one or more household pets, which are defined as domesticated animals like dogs and cats.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1137 appears to be largely positive, as it addresses a common issue faced by pet owners in rental housing. Advocates for the bill emphasize its role in improving the quality of life for individuals who seek the companionship of pets, particularly those in vulnerable demographics like the elderly. However, some concerns may exist regarding enforcement and adherence to local ordinances, such as issues relating to noise or property damage caused by pets.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for the bill regarding its intentions, potential points of contention may arise from landlords or property managers who worry about liability, maintenance issues, and the enforcement of pet-related regulations. Moreover, discussions surrounding the balance between accommodating pets and maintaining living standards in housing complexes could reflect divergent opinions among stakeholders in the housing and animal control sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1795

Civil actions: unlawful detainer: court records.

CA SB971

Housing: household pets.

CA AB2778

Polanco agrihousing.

CA SB829

Cannabis: donations.

CA SB469

Housing: publicly funded low-rent housing projects.

CA AB878

Victims of abuse or violence: reasonable accommodations.

CA AB2992

Employment practices: leave time.

CA AB2746

Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments: agricultural employee housing.