California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB971

Introduced
2/10/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Engrossed
5/24/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Enrolled
8/15/22  
Chaptered
9/2/22  

Caption

Housing: household pets.

Impact

The legislation aims to alleviate housing challenges faced by low-income families who often relinquish pets due to restrictive housing policies. With a significant portion of renters being pet owners, SB 971 will facilitate access to housing without the typical fees and restrictions, thereby addressing a prevalent issue of housing insecurity for pet owners. It seeks to encourage property owners and developers to provide more pet-friendly affordable housing options, which could lead to improved stability for families and reduced shelter intake rates for pets.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 971, introduced by Newman, amends the Health and Safety Code to enhance pet ownership rights in housing developments financed with state assistance. The key provision mandates that any housing development financed on or after January 1, 2023, must allow residents to own or maintain common household pets, including dogs and cats. This requirement is subject to existing state laws and local ordinances regarding public health and animal control. Notably, the bill prohibits landlords from imposing monthly fees on pet ownership in these developments, acting to reduce barriers for pet owners seeking affordable housing.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 971 is largely positive among animal welfare advocates and pet owners, who see the bill as a substantial step towards integrating pets into the lives of residents in affordable housing. Proponents argue that the rights to pet ownership should be preserved even in rental situations, as pets are considered family members by many. However, some landlords and property management companies may express concerns about potential impacts on property management and liability issues, which could lead to pushback against the bill.

Contention

Despite its popularity, the bill faced some contention regarding the balance between accommodating pets and the rights of landlords to regulate their properties. Concerns were raised around the responsibilities of residents in managing their pets, including potential damage or disturbances. The legislation carefully outlines that while landlords cannot charge monthly fees, they retain the right to enforce reasonable conditions, such as noise controls and liability coverage. This aspect of the bill is crucial to ensuring a balanced approach that protects both the pet ownership rights of tenants and the rights of landlords.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1137

Housing developments: pet permissibility.

CA AB2216

Tenancy: common household pets.

CA AB1795

Civil actions: unlawful detainer: court records.

MN SF371

Housing Finance Agency requirement of reasonable pet policies in buildings financed by the agency requirement

CA AB311

Dwelling units: persons at risk of homelessness.

CA SB681

Housing.

CA SB7

Surplus nonresidential property and State Highway Route 710.

CA SB91

COVID-19 relief: tenancy: federal rental assistance.