California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1196

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Engrossed
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Refer
5/25/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
3/22/18  
Report Pass
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/19/18  

Caption

California Coastal Act of 1976: Port of Newport Beach.

Impact

The implications of AB 1196 are significant, particularly in the realm of education funding. By enabling longer financing options for the furnishing and equipping of classrooms, the bill aims to facilitate the securing of funds necessary for improving educational facilities. This change may positively impact local educational agencies' ability to upgrade and enhance classroom environments, which is especially crucial in a time when educational resources are in high demand.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1196, introduced by Assembly Member Harper, amends provisions related to the issuance of school bonds for the purpose of financing projects that include the furnishing and equipping of classrooms. The bill specifies that the weighted average maturity of such bonds should not exceed 120% of the average reasonably expected economic life of the financed project. Historically, school district bonds have had a maximum term of 25 years; however, this bill allows for longer terms specifically for education-related projects, enhancing the flexibility for school funding.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 1196 appears to be pragmatic, with advocates emphasizing the importance of providing schools with adequate resources and flexibility in funding. Educational leaders and school districts might view the bill positively as it aligns with their goals of improving educational quality. However, concerns may arise regarding the long-term financial implications of extending bond maturities, particularly in terms of fiscal responsibility and potential impacts on local budgets.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1196 center on the balance between local governance and state mandates. The bill imposes certain requirements on local officials by mandating consultation with the California Coastal Commission regarding coastal resource management. This addition may spark debates over local control versus state oversight, as communities may have differing opinions on the regulation and protection of coastal resources. Additionally, the state-mandated reimbursements for costs associated with implementing these provisions could be a point of discussion in legislative circles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB951

California Coastal Act of 1976: coastal zone: coastal development.

CA AB2560

Density Bonus Law: California Coastal Act of 1976.

CA AB584

California Coastal Act of 1976: coastal development: emergency waiver.

CA SB1249

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA SB410

Powering Up Californians Act.

CA AB2400

California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority Act.

CA AB2636

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA AB305

California Flood Protection Bond Act of 2024.

CA AB1291

University of California Associate Degree for Transfer Pilot Program.

CA SB704

Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas developments: refineries: petrochemical facilities: offshore wind.

Similar Bills

CA AB1995

Pupil nutrition: reduced-price meals.

CA AB508

Pupil nutrition: reduced-price meals.

CA AB715

Educational equity: discrimination.

CA AB22

Preschool data: data collection.

CA AB3216

Pupils: use of smartphones.

CA AB1269

Community colleges: part-time faculty.

CA AB2570

School facilities: Clean and Healthy Schools Act: environmentally preferable cleaning and cleaning maintenance products.

CA AB1299

Community colleges: Compton Community College District.