California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1236

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Refer
5/17/17  

Caption

Surnames before first marriage.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1236 will bring significant alterations to existing state laws regarding personal identifying information and vital records. These amendments will necessitate local officials to conduct additional tasks related to the handling of vital records. The bill could also affect consumer credit reporting practices by requiring card issuers to accommodate requests for cards issued in individuals' birth names, thereby enhancing personal identification security.

Summary

AB 1236, introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez Fletcher, proposes amendments to state laws concerning the documentation of names, particularly focusing on individuals' birth names and surnames before their first marriage. The bill aims to replace the term 'maiden name' with 'birth name surname before first marriage' in several areas of the law, including the issuing of credit cards and the requirements for death certificates and legal documents. This change reflects an effort to promote inclusivity and recognize the importance of maintaining individuals' original names, regardless of marital status.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 1236 has largely been positive among those advocating for individuals’ rights and recognition of personal identity within legal frameworks. Supporters argue that the bill is a progressive step toward recognizing diversity and fostering a society that respects individuals' names regardless of gender norms or marital status. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential administrative burdens it may impose on local agencies responsible for implementing these changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 1236 include discussions about its broader implications for identity verification and privacy. While proponents emphasize the importance of personal identity being respected in official documents, critics caution about the potential for increased complexity and confusion in legal processes, particularly concerning identity theft protections and the management of personal identifying information in various administrative contexts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1511

Health omnibus.

CA SB680

Names.

CA AB2750

Certified copies of death records.

CA SB406

Health care: omnibus bill.

CA AB751

Vital records: certified copies: electronic requests.

CA AB2376

Vital records: certified copies: electronic requests.

VA HB2120

Higher educational institutions, public; agreement to provide aggregated, nonconfidential case data.

CA AB3176

Indian children.