California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB680

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/28/19  
Refer
5/28/19  
Report Pass
6/4/19  

Caption

Names.

Impact

If enacted, SB 680 will have a profound impact on how names are presented and recorded in legal contexts within the state of California. By removing restrictive terminology, the bill aims to ensure that individuals can express their identity more fully, potentially reducing administrative barriers that may arise when individuals seek to update their personal information in legal documents. The updated language also aims to better align California’s legal framework with evolving social norms regarding gender and identity.

Summary

Senate Bill 680, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, aims to modernize terminology and legal definitions related to personal names in California statutes. The bill proposes significant modifications to various sections of the Civil Code, Code of Civil Procedure, Family Code, Penal Code, and Welfare and Institutions Code by replacing outdated terms such as 'maiden name' with gender-neutral alternatives, reflecting contemporary understanding and sensitivities about gender identity and personal naming conventions. This change is intended to make legal documents and processes more inclusive and responsive to diversity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 680 is largely positive among supporters who argue that changing the language reinforces inclusivity and helps combat discrimination based on gender identity. Many advocates view the bill as a necessary step forward in civil rights, promoting a more modern and equitable legal system. However, there remains some contention from groups who believe that such changes might undermine traditional naming conventions or create confusion in legal settings.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions around the implications for individuals who may wish to retain traditional naming structures versus those advocating for fully gender-neutral language. Some critics argue that the changes, while well-intentioned, could complicate legal processes by creating inconsistencies in how names are recorded or recognized in various legal scenarios. Overall, the bill represents a focal point in the broader debate about identity, rights, and evolving social values.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1236

Surnames before first marriage.

CA AB3176

Indian children.

CA AB81

Indian children: child custody proceedings.

CA AB976

Electronic filing and service.

CA AB2711

Juvenile records access.

CA SB811

Public safety: omnibus.

CA AB2960

Judiciary omnibus.

VA HB890

Va. Freedom of Information Act; release of certain law-enforcement criminal incident information.