California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1285

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/19/17  
Refer
6/19/17  
Refer
6/19/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Enrolled
8/21/17  
Enrolled
8/21/17  
Chaptered
9/1/17  
Chaptered
9/1/17  
Passed
9/1/17  

Caption

Alcoholic Beverage Control Act: administrative hearings: records.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1285 will primarily affect how records are maintained for administrative hearings within the realm of alcoholic beverage regulation in California. By banning videographic recording, the legislation seeks to standardize the methods of documentation and ensure that all parties involved in appeals receive records that are generated consistently through stenographic means. This is seen as a move to clarify the admissibility of evidence in disputes and appeals related to alcoholic beverage licensing and regulation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1285, introduced by Gipson, aims to amend the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act by adding Section 24301 to the Business and Professions Code. The bill specifically prohibits the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control from creating a record of administrative hearings via videographic recordings. Instead, it mandates that proceedings be reported by a stenographic reporter unless consent is given for an electronic report. The intention behind this change is to streamline the record-keeping process during alcohol-related administrative hearings and appeals.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1285 appears to be positive among legislative supporters who believe that simplifying the recording process will enhance the efficiency of hearings. Advocates argue that traditional stenographic reporting is a more reliable means of capturing the proceedings than videographic methods. However, there might be concerns regarding transparency and accessibility, as videographic records can sometimes enhance understanding of proceedings, especially for public scrutiny.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding AB 1285 could arise from differing opinions on the effectiveness of stenographic reporting compared to videographic recordings. Some may argue that eliminating the option for video recordings reduces access to detailed auditory and visual accounts of hearings that could benefit appellants and the public. The bill essentially centralizes the method of record-keeping in a way that emphasizes traditional practices over modern recording technologies, prompting discussions on the balance between maintaining established practices and adapting to new standards of documentation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB504

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.

CA SB451

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.

CA AB231

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.

CA AB1818

Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: licensed manicurists.

VA HB2654

Unlawful dissemination of intimate images of another; creates a tiered system of penalties.

VA HB2288

Unlawful dissemination of intimate images of another; creates a tiered system of penalties.

CA AB816

Employment: employees and independent contractors: merchandisers.

VA HB1525

AI-generated image; unauthorized creation of image of another, penalties.