California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1332

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/11/17  
Chaptered
10/11/17  
Passed
10/11/17  

Caption

Juveniles: dependents: removal.

Impact

The bill represents a significant change to California's child welfare laws, potentially impacting how courts and child welfare services respond to dependency cases. By establishing higher evidentiary standards for the removal of children from parental custody, AB 1332 aims to reduce unnecessary family separations. The modification is expected to promote stronger protections for parents not living with the child at the time of the petition while ensuring the child's safety and emotional health remain paramount in adjudications.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1332 amends Section 361 of the Welfare and Institutions Code regarding the circumstances under which a child can be removed from a parent's custody during dependency proceedings. The bill specifies that a child cannot be removed from the physical custody of a parent with whom the child did not reside at the time the dependency petition was filed unless there is clear and convincing evidence of substantial danger to the child's well-being. This is intended to protect parents' rights and establish stricter guidelines for child removal during such legal processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1332 appears divided among stakeholders. Supporters argue that it provides necessary protections for parents who might be unfairly removed from their children's lives, thereby prioritizing family unity. Conversely, critics express concern that the bill might hinder child protective services from effectively intervening in cases where children's safety is at risk, potentially placing children in harm's way. This polarized sentiment suggests a complex debate regarding the balance of parental rights and child protection.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the bill’s potential implications for children’s safety and welfare. The requirement for 'clear and convincing evidence' before removing a child from a non-custodial parent's care could protect parental rights but may also delay necessary interventions in critical situations. This balance highlights the ongoing tension within child welfare policies: the need to safeguard children's emotional and physical well-being while ensuring parents are treated fairly in legal proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3291

Developmental services.

CA SB233

Foster children: records.

CA AB2317

Children’s psychiatric residential treatment facilities.

CA AB81

Indian children: child custody proceedings.

CA AB3176

Indian children.