California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1339

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Refer
6/13/17  
Refer
6/13/17  
Enrolled
7/3/17  
Enrolled
7/3/17  
Chaptered
7/21/17  

Caption

Public employment: background investigations.

Impact

The impact of AB 1339 on state law includes creating a more uniform protocol for background checks across various law enforcement agencies. While it strengthens the ability of law enforcement to gather essential employment-related information on candidates, it also raises potential concerns regarding the balance between an individual’s right to privacy and the need for transparency in public safety positions. The law mandates that employers comply with certain conditions—such as written requests and notarized authorizations from applicants—thus establishing a formalized approach to accessing sensitive employment information.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1339, introduced by Cunningham, amends Section 1031.1 of the Government Code concerning public employment background investigations. The bill significantly expands the scope of information that employers must disclose about current or former employees when authorities request it for the purpose of conducting background checks. Originally limited to peace officer roles, this bill allows law enforcement agencies to obtain employment details related to applicants for any position within their agencies, enhancing the investigative process for ensuring candidate suitability. The bill emphasizes both accountability and transparency within law enforcement hiring practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1339 is largely supportive among law enforcement entities and some lawmakers, who view the bill as a necessary tool to enhance public safety by ensuring that applicants for law enforcement roles are thoroughly vetted. However, some critics have expressed concerns about privacy implications, fearing that extending access to employment records could lead to overreach and misuse of information. The discussions around the bill illustrate a tension between public safety priorities and individual privacy rights, highlighting a broader debate about the responsibilities of employers and the interests of the public.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to AB 1339 include fears that the bill may dilute employee privacy protections established under the California Constitution. While the bill seeks to clarify and streamline background investigations, advocates for privacy threaten to raise potential legal challenges or call for amendments to ensure employee rights are safeguarded. The bill stipulates that employers will not incur civil liability when disclosing information as mandated, but it is crucial to monitor the ramifications of this policy shift for both employers and applicants in public employment contexts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB655

California Law Enforcement Accountability Reform Act.

CA AB1008

Transportation network companies: participating drivers: investigative consumer reports.

CA SB960

Public employment: peace officers: citizenship.

NM SB302

Gaming Control Board Access Background Checks

CA SB809

California Fair Employment and Housing Act: Fair Chance Act: conviction history.

CA AB2323

Child abuse or neglect: foster children.

AZ SB1438

DCS information; central registry; exceptions

CA AB354

Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.