California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1440

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Engrossed
5/26/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Enrolled
7/6/17  
Chaptered
7/24/17  
Passed
7/24/17  

Caption

Peace officers.

Impact

The bill amends the California Penal Code by adding Section 830.85, delineating that ICE and CBP officers do not have the same status or authority as peace officers in California. This change aims to protect community trust in local law enforcement by preventing federal immigration officers from acting as if they have the same authority as state peace officers. The intent is to reassure communities, especially those with significant immigrant populations, that their local law enforcement is distinct from federal immigration enforcement.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1440 seeks to clarify the status of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in California by explicitly stating that they are not recognized as California peace officers. This legislation was prompted by growing concerns in the state regarding the tactics employed by ICE under the current federal administration, particularly their tendency to misrepresent themselves as local law enforcement to gather information about undocumented immigrants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1440 is largely supportive among those who advocate for immigrant rights and local law enforcement integrity. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to safeguard community trust and ensure that local police are not conflated with federal enforcement agencies. However, dissent may arise from those who believe that ICE and CBP do play an important role in public safety, suggesting that this legislation may hinder their effectiveness in certain situations.

Contention

Key points of contention focus on the implications of separating federal and local law enforcement roles. Critics of the bill could argue that it may create barriers to effective collaboration between federal and local authorities when addressing issues of public safety. Additionally, the legislation could spark debates about the appropriate level of federal engagement in local law enforcement, particularly in states with high immigrant populations where federal law enforcement intervention may be necessary.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1306

California Cybersecurity Integration Center.

CA AB2695

California State University: Cybersecurity Regional Alliances and Multistakeholder Partnerships Pilot Program.

CA AB1173

California State University: Center to Close Achievement Gaps.

CA AB2813

California Cybersecurity Integration Center.

CA AB2507

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: representatives.

CA AB327

COVID-19 vaccination status: prohibition on required disclosure.

CA SB844

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: cybersecurity improvement: reports.

CA AB2578

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: integrated energy policy report: carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration.