California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1495

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Refer
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
7/17/17  
Refer
7/18/17  
Refer
8/21/17  

Caption

Civil liability: sexual abuse: children.

Impact

The bill is expected to have a broad impact on state laws surrounding environmental protections and local government authority. With enhanced funding and support from the state, local governments would gain the capability to implement initiatives aligned with federal guidelines, thereby improving disaster responses. This could also lead to more effective management of natural resources and improvement in overall public safety standards, creating a more resilient infrastructure in face of climate change challenges.

Summary

AB1495 proposes significant changes to California's environmental regulation framework, particularly in relation to disaster preparedness and response. The bill aims to enhance the state's ability to comply with federal environmental standards while providing local governments with the necessary tools to better prepare for and respond to environmental disasters. By streamlining processes and bolstering state funding for local initiatives, AB1495 seeks to protect communities and promote faster recovery from adverse environmental events.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB1495 appears to be positive, primarily among environmental advocacy groups and local government officials who view the bill as a critical step toward improving disaster preparedness. Supporters highlight the importance of coordinating state and local efforts to build a stronger regulatory framework. However, there are concerns from certain stakeholders about the potential cost implications and the extent of state oversight in local decision-making, which could complicate compliance for smaller jurisdictions.

Contention

Notable points of contention center on the balance of power between state and local governments. Critics argue that while the intent of the bill is laudable, it could inadvertently undermine local authority by imposing state mandates that may not adequately take into account the specific needs and contexts of different communities. Debates have arisen regarding the adequacy of funding provisions and whether they will truly empower local governments or simply serve as a superficial fix to deeper systemic issues in environmental governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB781

Public Safety Omnibus.

CA SB50

Connected devices: device protection requests.

CA AB3209

Crimes: theft: retail theft restraining orders.

CA AB561

Restraining orders.

CA AB786

Restraining orders: filing fees.

CA AB2694

Domestic violence: ex parte orders.

CA AB36

Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.

CA AB925

Protective orders: confidential information regarding minors.