California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1531

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
9/13/17  
Refer
9/14/17  
Refer
9/14/17  
Refer
9/15/17  
Refer
1/3/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Refer
1/11/18  
Report Pass
1/18/18  
Engrossed
1/29/18  
Engrossed
1/29/18  
Refer
1/29/18  
Refer
1/29/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Enrolled
8/20/18  
Enrolled
8/20/18  
Chaptered
9/5/18  

Caption

Court fees: electronic filing.

Impact

The bill has a significant impact on the Code of Civil Procedure and Government Code relating to fees related to court filings. By mandating that attorneys are notified about unpaid fees and are subject to sanctions, it could lead to improved compliance with payment obligations. This adjustment reflects an effort to modernize the court's handling of electronic filings and provide a clearer process for dealing with nonpayment of fees, which is expected to improve operational efficiency within the court system.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1531, introduced by Berman, focuses on the management of court fees and electronic filing processes within California's judicial system. The bill amends existing laws to specify that if an electronic filing is made by an attorney through an electronic filing service provider, and payment remains outstanding for a specified duration, the attorney can be sanctioned by the court. This aims to streamline fee collection and ensure prompt payment from represented parties to enhance the efficiency of court operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1531 is largely supportive, particularly from legal professionals and those advocating for more efficient court operations. However, there continues to be discussions around the implications this could have on attorney-client relationships, as the pressure for attorneys to manage filing payments could inadvertently affect their practice. Critics are concerned that sanctions might lead to unintended consequences for attorneys unable to collect fees from clients timely.

Contention

Notable points of contention concerning AB 1531 revolve around the fairness and implications of sanctioning attorneys for their clients' nonpayment of fees. Concerns have been raised about potential accountability issues—how it could disproportionately affect less affluent clients who may struggle with payment. Additionally, discussions on whether these amendments might impede access to justice by imposing stricter controls on legal practitioners have been paramount in legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1403

General assistance: eligibility.

KS HB2089

Enacting the consumer inflation reduction and tax fairness act and exempting the portion of a credit card transaction constituting a tax or gratuity from assessment of the fee charged by the card issuer.

CA SB470

Electronic benefits transfer system.

CT HB07275

An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Cigarettes, Tobacco Products, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems And Vapor Products.

CA AB1365

CalAccount Program.

CA SB1140

Public social services: electronic benefits transfer cards.

CA AB1177

California Public Banking Option Act.

CA AB1065

Credit card transaction fees: tax payments: Consumer Inflation Reduction and Tax Fairness Act.