California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB158

Introduced
1/12/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Peace officers: hate crime reporting guidelines.

Impact

The bill's implementation is intended to impact state laws significantly by establishing clearer definitions and frameworks for reporting hate crimes. It mandates the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to develop statewide reporting guidelines by January 1, 2019. Law enforcement agencies are required to train their personnel on these new guidelines and ensure adherence by July 1, 2019. Furthermore, as specified in the bill, the state will provide financial reimbursements to local agencies for any costs incurred due to these new mandates, thereby addressing potential financial concerns regarding compliance.

Summary

Assembly Bill 158, introduced by Assembly Member Chu, aims to enhance the reporting and documentation of hate crimes by law enforcement agencies in California. The bill mandates that local law enforcement agencies must include specific checkboxes in their departmental reports to indicate whether an incident was bias-related. This initiative seeks to improve data collection regarding hate crimes, allowing for better analysis and understanding of the prevalence of these incidents. By implementing these requirements, the legislation is expected to strengthen the state's criminal justice response to hate crimes.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards AB 158 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers and advocacy groups focused on civil rights and social justice. Proponents argue that the bill represents a crucial step toward accountability in law enforcement and emphasizes the importance of accurately documenting hate-related incidents. However, there may be concerns from law enforcement regarding the additional administrative burden that could arise from these new requirements. Overall, the dialogue surrounding the bill reveals a shared commitment to addressing and preventing hate crimes but acknowledges the complexities involved in its implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential increase in workload for law enforcement agencies and the thoroughness of the reporting guidelines to be developed. Some lawmakers emphasize the importance of not only collecting data but also ensuring that adequate training is provided to officers on identifying and classifying hate crimes. There is also concern about how these changes will affect ongoing community-policing efforts and the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1757

Peace officers: hate crime reporting guidelines.

CA AB572

Law enforcement: training: racial profiling.

CA SB273

Domestic violence.

CA AB1029

California Victim Compensation Board.

CA AB243

Implicit bias training: peace officers.

CA SB411

Stop Child Hunger Act of 2025.

CA AB837

Peace officers: training: hate crimes.

CA SB237

Special education: dyslexia risk screening.