Implicit bias training: peace officers.
AB 243 impacts state laws by imposing a new training requirement for a wide range of peace officers, including those in local police departments, state agencies like the California Highway Patrol, and educational institutions. The bill represents a significant shift in how California addresses issues of racial bias within law enforcement, aiming to make officers more effective and equitable in their interactions with various communities. The state will also be responsible for reimbursing local agencies for the costs associated with this additional training, in accordance with the California Constitution regarding state mandates.
Assembly Bill 243, introduced by Assembly Member Kamlager-Dove, mandates enhanced training for peace officers in California to address implicit bias and racial profiling. The bill amends Section 13519.4 of the Penal Code, requiring peace officers who undergo this training to complete an eight-hour refresher course every two years, rather than the current five-year requirement. This refresher training is intended to deepen officers' understanding of racial and identity profiling and to promote strategies that reduce bias. Additionally, the training will incorporate implicit association testing to help officers understand their own biases more clearly.
The sentiment surrounding AB 243 appears to be supportive among many lawmakers and community advocates who see the bill as a necessary step toward improving police-community relations and reducing bias in law enforcement. Proponents argue that providing officers with better training can have a positive impact on public safety and create a more equitable justice system. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential increase in state costs and logistical implications for local law enforcement agencies due to the new training mandates.
The notable points of contention regarding AB 243 center around the effectiveness of implicit bias training as a means to reduce actual discriminatory practices in policing. Critics question whether additional training alone can significantly alter the ingrained practices and attitudes present in law enforcement, suggesting that more systemic reforms may be necessary to bring about meaningful change. This debate highlights the broader discussions on police reform and community policing strategies within California and beyond.