California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1630

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/16/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Wildlife movements.

Impact

The legislation adds Chapter 13 to the Fish and Game Code, establishing a framework to assess and remediate barriers to wildlife passage. Significant provisions include the requirement for the Director of Transportation, in association with wildlife officials, to produce a report every three years on the status of identified barriers to wildlife connectivity. This initiative not only aims to protect wildlife but also seeks to reduce vehicle collisions with animals, enhancing road safety for both drivers and wildlife.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1630, introduced by Assembly Member Bloom, focuses on enhancing wildlife movement across transportation infrastructure in California. It emphasizes the importance of wildlife corridors, which are vital for maintaining the ecological balance by allowing safe passage for various wildlife species. The bill mandates the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Department of Transportation to collaborate on developing a programmatic environmental review process that ensures wildlife connectivity in transportation planning and infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1630 reflects a growing awareness and responsibility towards environmental protection and wildlife conservation. Supporters argue that the bill is crucial for safeguarding animal populations that are increasingly threatened by climate change and habitat fragmentation. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding potential impacts on development and transportation efficiency, although the overall focus is on fostering a sustainable coexistence of wildlife and human activities.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention relates to the balance between infrastructure development and wildlife conservation. While the bill promotes ecological safety, critics may argue about the potential constraints it could place on transportation projects and urban development. The long-term effects of implementing wildlife passage features and ensuring compliance with new environmental review processes may also raise practical considerations and discussions among stakeholders in both environmental and transportation sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1372

Wildlife corridors and connectivity: Wildlife and Biodiversity Protection and Movement Act of 2020.

CA AB2320

Wildlife Connectivity and Climate Adaptation Act of 2024: wildlife corridors: fish passage.

CA AB118

Transportation.

CA SB103

Transportation.

CA AB111

Transportation: zero-emission vehicles.

CA SB671

Transportation: Clean Freight Corridor Efficiency Assessment.

CA AB2344

Wildlife connectivity: transportation projects.

CA AB902

Transportation projects: barriers to wildlife movement.