Wildlife corridors and connectivity: Wildlife and Biodiversity Protection and Movement Act of 2020.
The legislation will amend existing laws to require state agencies to consider wildlife corridors in their planning processes. Key provisions include the establishment of an Advance Mitigation Pilot Program, which will facilitate the creation of compensatory mitigation credits to offset impacts on wildlife connectivity caused by state projects. This program aims to streamline environmental compliance under the California Environmental Quality Act while promoting the establishment and enhancement of habitat linkages across the state.
Senate Bill 1372, known as the Wildlife and Biodiversity Protection and Movement Act of 2020, aims to improve the management and protection of wildlife corridors and enhance habitat connectivity throughout California. The bill mandates the Department of Fish and Wildlife to study and identify critical areas for wildlife movement and the impact of climate change as well as state infrastructure projects on these corridors. It emphasizes the importance of connectivity between habitats, particularly as climate change continues to alter natural landscapes, thus ensuring that wildlife can migrate safely and maintain genetic diversity.
The sentiment surrounding SB 1372 is generally positive among environmental advocates as it represents a proactive approach to biodiversity conservation. Supporters argue that it not only focuses on improving wildlife habitats but also integrates comprehensive planning to mitigate environmental impacts from infrastructure projects. However, potential contention exists regarding the balance between development and environmental protection, with some stakeholders concerned about the implications for land use and resource management.
Notable points of contention include the expansion of the Advance Mitigation Program, which requires robust engagement between various state agencies and stakeholders, including local governments and conservation organizations. Critics may argue that this consolidation of authority could lead to one-size-fits-all solutions that overlook local ecological needs. Additionally, the challenge remains in effectively funding these initiatives and ensuring compliance among various stakeholders involved in state infrastructure projects.