California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1665

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
7/3/17  
Refer
7/3/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Report Pass
8/29/17  
Report Pass
8/29/17  
Refer
8/29/17  
Refer
8/29/17  
Refer
9/1/17  
Refer
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Refer
9/14/17  
Refer
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Chaptered
10/15/17  
Chaptered
10/15/17  

Caption

Telecommunications: California Advanced Services Fund.

Impact

This legislation directly impacts the regulatory landscape in California as it modifies existing telecommunications frameworks. Specifically, it removes the Broadband Infrastructure and Revolving Loan Account and reallocates those funds into new accounts designed to better support broadband infrastructure development. Additionally, the CPUC will be required to conduct financial and performance audits of the CASF and report findings to the legislature, thereby increasing accountability in how funds are utilized for broadband projects.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1665, also known as the Internet for All Now Act, primarily aims to expand broadband access across the state of California. The bill mandates the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to prioritize projects that deliver last-mile broadband services to unserved households, ensuring that at least 98% of households receive adequate connectivity by the end of 2022. By redefining the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF), AB 1665 stops the authorization for certain funds while introducing new accounts and funding mechanisms to facilitate broadband deployment and promote digital literacy through grants and educational programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1665 appears largely supportive, particularly among proponents who advocate for increased access to broadband as a vital utility. Supporters argue that improved access will enhance economic growth, create jobs, and bridge the digital divide, making it an essential measure in modern infrastructure development. However, potential criticism may arise regarding the bill's implications on service providers and the handling of public funds, although no significant opposition is noted in the discussions.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is supportive, contention may surface related to the feasibility of achieving the stipulated goals, particularly the challenge of universal broadband access within the proposed timeline. Concerns also exist about whether the funding allocations will adequately meet the needs of underserved communities, and if funding will be sufficient to cover costs, particularly in rural areas which may face higher barriers to connectivity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1349

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Adoption Account.

CA AB1409

California Teleconnect Fund Administrative Committee Fund: Digital Divide Grant Program: homework gap projects.

CA AB1425

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Public Housing Account.

CA SB740

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.

CA AB1426

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Adoption Account.

CA AB2104

California Advanced Services Fund.

CA SB1130

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.

CA SB4

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.