Adult-use cannabis and medicinal cannabis: license application: OSHA training.
The passage of AB 1700 represents a significant step towards reinforcing safety standards in the burgeoning cannabis industry, which operates under the regulations established by the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act and the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. By integrating OSHA training requirements into the licensing process, the bill contributes to an overall culture of safety and accountability among cannabis businesses, ensuring that workers are equipped with vital safety knowledge and practices.
Assembly Bill No. 1700, introduced by Assembly Member Cooper, addresses the licensing process for both medical and adult-use cannabis in California. Specifically, it mandates that applicants for state cannabis licenses provide proof of employing or planning to employ an individual who has completed a federally recognized Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 10-hour general industry training course. This requirement aims not only to enhance workplace safety within the cannabis industry but also to align with statewide regulations that govern the cultivation and distribution of cannabis products.
Discussions surrounding AB 1700 largely reflect a positive sentiment among stakeholders who prioritize worker safety and regulatory compliance. Supporters emphasize the necessity of having trained personnel in cannabis operations to minimize workplace accidents and ensure adherence to health standards. However, there may be concerns from some within the industry about the additional burden that training requirements could impose on new and existing businesses, particularly smaller operators who might find it challenging to meet stringent compliance obligations.
Notable points of contention involve the implications of expanding the definition of perjury within the bill, which could lead to increased legal scrutiny over licensing applications. Critics of this provision argue that adding such legal risks may deter potential applicants from entering the cannabis market. Furthermore, there are discussions about the sufficiency of local regulations in relation to state mandates, as local jurisdictions may have different standards which could complicate the compliance landscape for cannabis businesses.