California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2980

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Vetoed
9/29/18  

Caption

Cannabis: premises: common space.

Impact

By allowing multiple licensed premises to utilize shared common areas, AB 2980 is expected to streamline operational efficiencies for cannabis businesses. This provision could lower operational costs for small businesses and encourage partnerships that enhance the cannabis industry landscape. The adjustments delineated in this bill support the aims of the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA), which was enacted to regulate legal cannabis use and sales, helping to further integrate cannabis businesses into the mainstream economy while promoting safety and compliance.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2980, introduced by Assembly Member Gipson, aims to amend Sections 26001 and 26051.5 of the Business and Professions Code related to cannabis regulations. This bill clarifies the definition of 'premises' under the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA), stipulating that licensed premises may share common areas without breaching regulatory requirements, as long as all participating licensees adhere to the specified regulations. The intent is to facilitate collaborative operations between cannabis businesses while ensuring compliance with existing laws.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2980 appears to be supportive among industry stakeholders. Proponents argue that enabling shared common space among licensed operations will foster business growth and innovation within the cannabis sector. Moreover, by maintaining strict compliance standards, the bill seeks to address health and safety concerns while also enhancing economic opportunities. Conversely, some cautious voices express concerns about potential regulatory oversights in shared spaces, advocating for careful implementation to ensure safety regulations are strictly followed.

Contention

While the bill primarily enjoys broad support, potential points of contention arise regarding the complexities of shared operations. Stakeholders may question the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance across shared areas, particularly regarding health and safety standards. The bill does include stipulations that require licensees to comply with all MDRSA obligations, but the practical application of these regulations and their enforcement could become a matter of debate, especially among local regulators who feel impacted by guidelines that may affect local control.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1294

Cannabis: state and local equity programs.

CA AB3261

Cannabis.

CA AB2844

Cannabis catering.

CA AB2799

Adult-use cannabis and medicinal cannabis: license application: OSHA training.

CA AB471

Cannabis catering.

CA SB1064

Cannabis: operator and separate premises license types: excessive concentration of licenses.

CA SB118

Cannabis: licenses: criminal records.