California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1761

Introduced
1/4/18  
Introduced
1/4/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Report Pass
5/8/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Refer
8/6/18  

Caption

Employee safety: hotel workers.

Impact

The bill's passage would add new obligations for hotel employers regarding the safety and well-being of their employees. By establishing minimum safety standards, AB 1761 aims to reduce the risks of violence and harassment that hotel workers often face. This legislation not only obliges hotel employers to create emergency response protocols but also extends protections for employees who report incidents of violence or harassment, thereby fostering a safer workplace environment and encouraging victims to come forward without fear of retaliation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1761 introduces significant measures designed to enhance employee safety for hotel workers in California. One of the key provisions mandates that hotel employers provide panic buttons to employees who work alone in guest rooms. This allows employees to summon immediate assistance in case of emergencies, ensuring a more secure working environment. Additionally, the bill requires hotels to post notices informing employees of their rights and the protections available to them under this law.

Sentiment

Discussions around AB 1761 show a generally supportive sentiment among advocates for worker safety, particularly from labor organizations and some lawmakers. Supporters emphasize the bill's necessity given the increasing incidents of violence against hotel employees, asserting that such measures are critical for employee welfare. However, there may be opposition from hotel industry representatives who could argue that compliance with these new regulations may require significant changes to their operating procedures and incur additional costs.

Contention

Despite its broad support, the bill has faced scrutiny regarding the feasibility and implementation timeline for hotels, especially smaller establishments that may find it burdensome to install emergency systems or provide additional training. Some critics argue that while the intention is noble, consideration should be given to how these measures could be enforced and monitored effectively without overburdening hotel operators, which could lead to unintended consequences for employment in the sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB626

Smoking tobacco in the workplace: transient lodging establishments.

CA SB461

Alcoholic beverage control: tied house restrictions.

CA AB423

Residential real property: rent control: withdrawal of accommodations.

CA AB2580

Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: exceptions.

CA AB854

Residential real property: withdrawal of accommodations.

CA SB863

Measures proposed by the Legislature.

CA AB3352

State Housing Law: enforcement response to complaints.

CA AB838

State Housing Law: enforcement response to complaints.