California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1882

Introduced
1/17/18  
Introduced
1/17/18  
Refer
1/29/18  
Report Pass
3/6/18  
Report Pass
3/6/18  
Refer
3/6/18  
Refer
3/6/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  

Caption

Sex crimes: communication with a minor.

Impact

By introducing the new crime of contacting a minor for the purpose of human trafficking, AB 1882 increases the scope of legal protections available to minors in California. Existing laws already penalize individuals for attempting to communicate with minors for specified sexual crimes; however, this addition serves to address the growing concerns surrounding human trafficking and the exploitation of minors. With this amendment, law enforcement agencies will have more robust tools to hold predators accountable and promote a safer environment for children.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1882, introduced by Assembly Members Cervantes and Cooley, aims to amend Section 288.3 of the Penal Code to expand the definition of crimes related to communication with minors. The bill specifically criminalizes any attempts or actions taken to contact or communicate with minors for the intent of committing human trafficking, in addition to existing offenses such as kidnapping and sexual assault. This amendment represents a strengthening of laws designed to protect minors from a range of predatory behaviors by making it clear that such communication with harmful intent is punishable by law.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1882 leans towards strong support, particularly among legislators and advocacy groups focused on child protection. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards reducing the risks associated with human trafficking and empowering law enforcement to effectively combat these crimes. Conversely, some concerns were raised about the potential for overreach and the need for adequate training and resources for law enforcement to enforce the new provisions effectively. Nevertheless, the overall legislative discourse reflects a consensus on the urgent need to enhance protections for minors.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the ramifications of expanding the criminal definitions within the existing legal framework. Critics may voice concerns about the fairness and proportionality of penalties imposed under the new law. The enforcement implications also suggest that additional training and resources will be necessary to ensure that law enforcement personnel can appropriately apply the new standards. As with any legislation addressing sensitive topics such as human trafficking, a balance must be struck between protecting vulnerable populations and safeguarding individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1396

Crimes: sexual assault.

CA AB837

Ketamine.

CA AB257

Encampments: penalties.

CA SB1266

Burglary.

CA SB358

Property crimes: mail theft.

CA SB398

Election crimes: payment based on voting or voter registration.

CA AB2814

Crimes: unlawful entry: intent to commit package theft.

CA SB65

Vehicles: alcohol and marijuana: penalties.