California Assembly Bill AB191

California 2017-2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/17
• Refer: 1/30/17
• Report Pass: 3/22/17
• Engrossed: 3/30/17
• Refer: 3/30/17
• Refer: 5/10/17
• Report Pass: 6/22/17
• Enrolled: 8/22/17
• Chaptered: 9/1/17
• Passed: 9/1/17

Caption

Mental health: involuntary treatment.

Impact

The amendments made by AB 191 are significant as they enhance the response capabilities of mental health professionals in urgent situations. By allowing a greater variety of licensed personnel to participate in the certification process, the bill aims to streamline the procedures for individuals in imminent risk of harm due to their mental health conditions. This change not only increases the available resources for mental health care but also recognizes the qualifications of a broader spectrum of professionals who play a critical role in mental health evaluations and treatment.

Summary

Assembly Bill 191, authored by Wood, seeks to amend sections of the Welfare and Institutions Code related to mental health and involuntary treatment procedures. This bill modifies existing law to allow licensed marriage and family therapists and licensed professional clinical counselors the authority to sign off on notices of certification for involuntary treatment, expanding the range of professionals able to participate in such evaluations. Previously, these roles were limited primarily to physicians and psychologists, which potentially restricted the capacity for timely and appropriate mental health intervention.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding this bill is positive, particularly among mental health advocates and practitioners who argue that the inclusive approach will lead to more efficient handling of cases requiring immediate attention. Supporters believe the legislation will ultimately benefit patients in crisis by reducing delays in the certification process. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the qualifications of newly included professionals and whether they possess adequate experience to make critical evaluations.

Contention

The main points of contention relate to the balance between accessibility of mental health treatment and the assurance of quality care. While expanding the list of professionals authorized to certify individuals for involuntary treatment is viewed as progressive, there is a contingent that worries about ensuring that all signatories possess the necessary clinical judgment and experience. As such, the ongoing discourse around AB 191 highlights the complexities involved in reforming mental health legislation to foster both broad access and high standards of care.