California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2004

Introduced
2/1/18  
Refer
2/12/18  
Refer
2/12/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Engrossed
3/22/18  
Engrossed
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Enrolled
6/18/18  
Enrolled
6/18/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Passed
7/9/18  

Caption

Big Bear Fire Agencies Pension Consolidation Act of 2018.

Impact

The bill's implementation signifies a significant shift in how pension and employment obligations are managed in the region. By consolidating these responsibilities into the Big Bear Fire Authority, the legislation seeks to streamline operations and ensure fiscal stability for fire protection services. It prevents the triggering of withdrawal liabilities typically associated with pension plan terminations, which could financially burden local governments.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2004, known as the Big Bear Fire Agencies Pension Consolidation Act of 2018, aims to consolidate the pension obligations for safety employees of the Big Bear Lake Fire Protection District into the Big Bear Fire Authority. This legislation permits the Big Bear Fire Authority to assume all revenues, debts, obligations, and liabilities related to the safety plan, ensuring that all current employees of the fire protection district are recognized as employees of the authority. This transfer is done without any interruption in service or benefits for the employees, maintaining their pension contributions and ensuring continuity in their retirement benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2004 appears to be generally positive among proponents of the consolidation, as it promises to simplify benefit management and secure pensions for public safety employees in a unified entity. However, there may be some concerns regarding the operational implications of consolidating responsibilities, particularly regarding how the authority will manage these obligations effectively.

Contention

Some points of contention could arise from the desire for local governing bodies to retain control over their pension plans. While the bill addresses administrative efficiency and continuity of employee benefits, it may be perceived as reducing local autonomy in pension management. Furthermore, different stakeholders may question the adequacy of the authority's capacity to fulfill these obligations without diminishing benefits or increasing contributions unexpectedly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB526

County employees’ retirement: districts: retirement system governance.

CA AB2011

West San Bernardino County Rail Construction Authority.

CA SB1390

Montclair to Ontario Airport Construction Authority.

CA AB1984

Courts.

CA AB1523

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: design-build.

CA AB1457

Regional business training center network: pilot project.

CA SB13

Local agency services: contracts: Counties of Napa and San Bernardino.

CA SB799

Local agency services: contracts: Counties of Napa and San Bernardino.