California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2270

Introduced
2/13/18  
Introduced
2/13/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/5/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Engrossed
4/26/18  
Engrossed
4/26/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/25/18  
Enrolled
7/3/18  
Chaptered
7/16/18  
Chaptered
7/16/18  
Passed
7/16/18  

Caption

Horse racing: out-of-country harness racing.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws related to horse racing operations by enabling the California Horse Racing Board to regulate and authorize new betting options that were previously limited. By allowing additional wagering opportunities, it could enhance revenue streams for the state as the bill aims to increase the funds generated from horse racing activities, which are to be allocated into the Fair and Exposition Fund. Moreover, it establishes penalties for violations under the Horse Racing Law, thereby creating new legal implications for racing associations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2270, introduced by McCarty, amends Section 19596.1 of the Business and Professions Code to authorize wagering on out-of-country harness racing. This bill expands the existing framework that allows California racing associations to accept bets on selected out-of-state and designated harness races. Under the new provisions, a single racetrack can conduct nightly wagering programs on out-of-country harness events without the limitation on the number of races that can be imported, as long as specific conditions are met, including conducting a minimum number of live races.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding AB 2270 appears positive among stakeholders within the horse racing community, as it opens new avenues for generating revenue and enhances the competitive edge of California's racing industry. However, concerns may arise among local agencies regarding compliance and the potential for increased regulation. The sentiment reflects an understanding of the benefits of increased wagering options while balancing the implications for regulatory oversight.

Contention

Notably, one of the points of contention surrounding AB 2270 is its requirement that no reimbursement is necessary for local agencies under certain conditions, particularly as this bill introduces new crimes related to violations of the Horse Racing Law. This clause could lead to discussions about the financial responsibilities of local governments in relation to new mandates created by the bill. Stakeholders may need to consider how these changes affect local financial dynamics regarding enforcement and regulation of horse racing activities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2284

Horse racing: out-of-state or out-of-country harness or quarter horse races.

CA AB1723

Horse Racing Law.

CA AB1174

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB1526

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB2139

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB351

Reduction of human remains and the disposition of reduced human remains.

CA AB2812

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB3179

Emergency telecommunications medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles.