California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3179

Introduced
2/16/24  
Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Engrossed
4/15/24  
Engrossed
4/15/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/6/24  
Refer
6/6/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Refer
8/23/24  
Refer
8/23/24  
Enrolled
8/30/24  
Enrolled
8/30/24  
Vetoed
9/29/24  

Caption

Emergency telecommunications medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles.

Impact

The bill's enactment will create an essential distinction in the state's regulations, allowing emergency telecommunications providers to operate their medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, such as bucket trucks and mobile units, without the immediate pressure of transitioning to zero-emission models. Proponents believe this is necessary to ensure that public safety remains uncompromised, particularly in instances of natural disasters or other significant disruption events, where maintaining reliable telecommunications services is critical.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3179, introduced by Assembly Member Juan Carrillo, aims to amend the Health and Safety Code to exempt emergency telecommunications vehicles from certain requirements of the Advanced Clean Fleets Regulations until January 1, 2030. This legislation recognizes the critical role these vehicles play in ensuring effective communication during emergencies and allows for continued operation without being hindered by zero-emission mandates. These vehicles are essential for participation in the federal Emergency Alert System and providing access to emergency services like 911 during crises.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 3179 appears to be supportive among officials and stakeholders involved in emergency response and telecommunications sectors. Advocates argue that the ability to restore communication services promptly during emergencies far outweighs the immediate environmental considerations. However, opponents of zero-emission mandates may express concern regarding the longer-term environmental impact as these vehicles continue to operate without transitioning to greener alternatives.

Contention

While the bill is generally welcomed as a means to maintain public safety, it may also generate debate regarding the long-term repercussions on environmental regulations. Some may view the exemption as a setback in the pursuit of sustainable vehicle practices, indicating a potential conflict between environmental goals and public safety. Additionally, the temporary nature of the exemption raises questions about future planning for the transition of emergency service vehicles as the deadline approaches.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB911

Emergency telecommunications medium- and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles.

CA AB2421

Land use: permitting: wireless communications: emergency standby generators.

CA SB1488

Public utilities: procurement from women-, minority-, disabled veteran-owned, and LGBT business enterprises.

CO HB1056

Local Government Permitting Wireless Telecommunications Facilities

CA AB1693

Public utilities: contracting.

IL SB1873

SCH CD-PHONE/SOCIAL MEDIA USE

CA SB599

Public Utilities Commission: proceedings, reports, and public utility procurement.

GA HB578

Public utilities; $1.50 increase in monthly 9-1-1 charge assessed by local governments; provide