California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2474

Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
5/23/18  
Refer
5/23/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Vetoed
9/27/18  

Caption

Hazardous waste: identification: testing.

Impact

The implications of AB 2474 on state laws revolve around enhancing the reliability and adaptability of hazardous waste identification methods. By introducing an option to adapt alternative testing techniques, the bill aims to streamline the process of identifying harmful substances without compromising safety standards. This could lead to more efficient management of hazardous waste and a potential reduction in the reliance on less ethical testing methodologies involving live organisms.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2474, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk, aims to amend Section 25141 of the Health and Safety Code regarding the identification and testing of hazardous and extremely hazardous wastes. The bill authorizes the Department of Toxic Substances Control to evaluate various testing methods to determine their suitability for identifying hazardous substances. A key provision allows for alternative testing methods which could be utilized instead of the traditional fish mortality testing, which is currently a standard practice for determining toxicity levels in waste management.

Sentiment

Discussion surrounding AB 2474 has generally been supportive, with many stakeholders acknowledging the need for modernizing environmental regulations and testing methods. Supporters emphasize the importance of flexible and innovative approaches to hazardous waste management that align with contemporary scientific practices. However, concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of alternative methods and their effectiveness compared to traditional practices, highlighting a need for ongoing scrutiny and robust regulatory oversight.

Contention

While the bill has received broad support, some contention exists regarding the adaptability of alternate testing methods. Critics argue that certain methods may not adequately predict the hazards posed by substances since the established fish mortality testing has long been a cornerstone in toxicology. The transition to new methods could potentially lead to variability in testing results, necessitating comprehensive validation to ensure public health and environmental safety are maintained.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB733

Hazardous waste: identification: testing.

CA AB1793

Hazardous waste: identification: acute aquatic toxicity criterion.

CA AB234

Microparticles.

CA AB2822

Brownfield Cleanup Funding Program: brownfields remediation: financing.

CA AB318

Hazardous waste: classification: cannabis waste.

CA AB1996

The California Cannabis Research Program.

CA SB237

Special education: dyslexia risk screening.

CA SB34

Residential treatment facilities.