California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2535

Introduced
2/14/18  
Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Engrossed
4/19/18  
Engrossed
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Refer
5/3/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Enrolled
8/14/18  
Enrolled
8/14/18  
Chaptered
9/17/18  

Caption

High-occupancy toll lanes: notice of toll evasion violation.

Impact

The proposed changes under AB2535 could result in significant adjustments for both toll enforcement agencies and vehicle owners. Agencies will have the added responsibility of collecting and presenting photographic evidence with each violation notice, which may require adapting technological systems for capturing and storing such evidence. For vehicle owners, having access to photographic proof of violations could enhance transparency in the enforcement process, potentially aiding in the contesting of unfair citations. However, there may be concerns about the implications for privacy with increased surveillance on toll roads.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2535, introduced by Assemblymember Obernolte, amends Section 40254 of the Vehicle Code to enhance the notice requirements for toll evasion violations. Under current law, if a vehicle is found to have evaded tolls, the issuing agency must send a notice of violation to the registered owner's address within a set period. AB2535 mandates that this notice must now also include photographic evidence of the violation if the vehicle was cited for not meeting occupancy requirements in a high-occupancy toll lane. This additional requirement is intended to provide clearer evidence to the vehicle owner regarding the circumstances of the violation.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB2535 appears to be generally positive among proponents who advocate for increased transparency and accountability in toll enforcement. Supporters argue that the inclusion of photographic evidence strengthens the case for issuing violations, allowing vehicle owners to better understand and respond to notices. Conversely, some concerns have been raised over potential bureaucratic burdens and the increased operational costs that may arise for local agencies tasked with implementing the change.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB2535 include the practical implications of requiring photographic evidence. Critics argue it may complicate the violation notification process or lead to disputes about the accuracy of the images provided. Additionally, the bill imposes a state-mandated local program, meaning local agencies might require reimbursement for additional costs incurred, raising questions about funding and resource allocation under the new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB664

Electronic toll and transit fare collection systems.

CA AB1312

College Consultants Act.

CA SB341

Telecommunications service: outages.

CA AB645

Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program.

CA AB289

State highway work zone speed safety program.

CA AB2705

Electricity: deenergization events.

CA SB1276

Vehicles: parking violations.

CA SB1309

Fishing: Fisheries Omnibus Bill of 2018.