California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB272

Introduced
2/1/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Refer
1/11/18  
Refer
1/11/18  
Refer
1/18/18  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Water utility service: sale of water utility property by a city.

Impact

The legislation modifies existing procedures under which municipal corporations can sell or transfer their utilities. It mandates that any sale or transfer must be approved by a majority of the city's legislative body and subsequently authorized by the city's voters. Furthermore, the bill sets forth specific requirements to ensure the adequacy of service, including studies of existing infrastructure and comparisons of service rates, thereby seeking to enhance the stability and reliability of water services across municipalities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 272, introduced by Assembly Member Gipson, addresses the sale of water utilities by municipalities in California. The bill permits cities that own and operate public water utilities to consolidate their water systems with other public systems under specific conditions. This legislation aims to streamline and improve water service provision by allowing municipalities to sell their utilities when it is deemed uneconomical to continue operating them, ensuring residents receive equitable access to water services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 272 is largely supportive among proponents who view it as a necessary step toward improving water quality and service efficiency in California. Supporters argue that by consolidating smaller, financially unsustainable water systems, communities can benefit from better resources and more reliable service. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders who fear that the consolidation may risk local control over water resources or prioritize profitability over community needs.

Contention

Key points of contention include how the consolidation might affect local governance and the perception of control among different municipalities. Opponents caution that this measure could potentially lead to the loss of local oversight of essential services, which could disadvantage smaller communities with unique water needs. Moreover, there are discussions regarding the implications for ratepayers of the subsumed water systems, ensuring that their rates do not increase post-consolidation and that the consolidation process is economically viable.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2339

Water utility service: sale of water utility property by a city.

CA AB850

City property: sale of water utility property.

CA AB2050

Small System Water Authority Act of 2018.

CA AB1195

Limited Eligibility and Appointment Program: lists.

CA SB414

Small System Water Authority Act of 2019.

CA SB634

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency.