California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2908

Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Report Pass
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/16/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Report Pass
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/13/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/27/18  
Vetoed
9/30/18  

Caption

Tire recycling: California tire regulatory fee and waste tire program.

Impact

If passed, AB 2908 would significantly impact California's tire recycling industry by establishing a policy goal of recycling at least 75% of solid waste tires generated annually. The bill directs the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to evaluate existing recycling programs and recommend necessary policy modifications to attain this recycling goal. It also outlines a tiered structure for incentive payments based on the projected California tire fee revenue, which could redirect funding towards higher recycling rates and more innovative tire-derived products.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2908, introduced by Assembly Member Berman, aims to amend existing laws regarding tire recycling and the California tire regulatory fee. The bill seeks to enhance the waste tire management system in California by instituting a structured incentive payment program for tire recycling. This program is designed to encourage public works projects utilizing rubberized pavement and to promote the recycling of waste tire materials. One of the key provisions includes transitioning from paper to electronic manifests for tracking waste tire transportation, streamlining the reporting process, and improving enforcement capabilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2908 appears to be generally positive among environmental advocates and sustainability stakeholders who view the bill as a proactive step in waste management. However, concerns have been raised by some industry representatives about the feasibility of meeting the ambitious recycling targets and the impact of the financial incentives on small businesses. The proposed changes are welcomed by those looking to improve California's waste management policies but are met with caution due to challenges in implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the feasibility of achieving the stated recycling goals and the potential economic burden on various stakeholders in the waste management sector. Critics argue that mandatory electronic manifests and stringent recycling requirements might disproportionately affect smaller haulers and businesses involved in tire recycling. Additionally, the bill's timeliness and compensation structures for waste tire recycling projects could lead to discrepancies in compliance and affect the competitive landscape for tire recycling in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB509

Tire recycling: California tire regulatory fee and waste tire program.

CA AB995

Hazardous waste.

CA SB552

Hazardous waste: household hazardous waste: door-to-door collection programs: residential pickup services.

CA AB1

Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Act of 2016: dealer notice: California battery fee.

CA SB158

Hazardous waste.

CA AB158

Personal Income Tax Law: Corporation Tax Law: exclusions from income: Paycheck Protection Program.

CA AB1597

Hazardous waste: transportation: electronic manifests.

CA SB774

Research program: firefighting: wildland and wildland-urban interface.