California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB309

Introduced
2/6/17  
Refer
2/21/17  
Refer
2/21/17  
Report Pass
3/14/17  
Report Pass
3/14/17  
Engrossed
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
6/6/17  
Enrolled
6/12/17  
Enrolled
6/12/17  
Chaptered
6/28/17  
Chaptered
6/28/17  
Passed
6/28/17  

Caption

Testamentary additions to trusts.

Impact

The legislation is expected to provide greater flexibility and clarity for individuals engaging in estate planning, especially concerning how their assets are distributed posthumously. By allowing the creation of testamentary trusts with updated terms within a specified timeframe, the bill aims to streamline the probate process and enhance the efficacy of trust administration. This change reflects an acknowledgment of the complexities of modern estate management, where timely administration of trusts is crucial for meeting the decedent's wishes and benefiting beneficiaries.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 309, introduced by Assemblymember Maienschein, amends Section 6300 of the Probate Code regarding testamentary additions to trusts. The bill enhances existing provisions related to the Uniform Testamentary Additions to Trusts Act, which allows for the valid devise of property to the trustee of a trust established by the testator. Notably, AB 309 permits for a written instrument that outlines the terms of the trust to be executed not only concurrently with the will but also within a 60-day window following the execution of the will.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 309 is supportive, particularly among legal professionals and estate planners who welcome the adjustments as progressive steps toward improving the legal framework governing trusts and wills. This sentiment is echoed in discussions indicating that the bill alleviates potential complications that could arise from outdated timelines in existing statutory provisions. Stakeholders advise that the flexibility afforded by the bill allows testators to ensure their estate planning accurately reflects their intentions, especially in dynamic family and financial circumstances.

Contention

While the bill garners overall support, there may still be points of contention regarding the implications of extending the time frame for amending trust provisions. Critics may argue that this could lead to increased litigation risk if not managed correctly or that it may invite ambiguity if terms laid out shortly after the will's execution conflict with previously established intentions. Hence, while AB 309 introduces beneficial changes, ongoing discussions around its application in practical scenarios are essential to address any unresolved legal uncertainties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1836

Use of likeness: digital replica.

TX HB2271

Relating to decedents' estates and certain posthumous gifts.

TX SB1017

Relating to decedents' estates and certain posthumous gifts.

LA SB190

Provides for transfer of items and accounts at banks, credit unions, and mutual associations when the account holder is deceased. (gov sig)

TX HB3950

Relating to digital replication rights in the voice and visual likeness of individuals; providing private causes of action; authorizing a fee.

TX SB1960

Relating to digital replication rights in the voice and visual likeness of individuals; providing private causes of action; authorizing a fee.