California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3147

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/26/18  
Report Pass
4/26/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Report Pass
4/30/18  
Report Pass
4/30/18  
Refer
5/1/18  
Refer
5/1/18  
Refer
5/23/18  

Caption

Fee mitigation act: housing developments.

Impact

If enacted, AB 3147 will significantly affect the local government’s authority concerning fee impositions. By prohibiting local agencies from increasing development fees for two years following the disclosure statement, the bill aims to provide developers with a stable financial expectation, thus potentially encouraging more housing projects to move forward. Additionally, the legislation seeks to clarify the responsibilities of local agencies in managing development costs and ensuring that local fees are predictable and transparent.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3147, introduced by Assembly Member Caballero, targets housing development projects in California by amending the Mitigation Fee Act and enhancing transparency around development fees. The bill mandates that once a housing development application is deemed complete, local agencies must provide applicants with a 'good faith statement' detailing the applicable fees. This is intended to prevent any local agencies from imposing new or increased fees or charges that exceed those in effect at the time the application was completed.

Sentiment

Reactions to AB 3147 are mixed among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill is a progressive measure designed to enhance the housing development process by eliminating unexpected cost increases during development, which can stymie construction. Conversely, critics warn that while the bill aims to provide certainty to developers, it could restrict the flexibility of local governments to respond to changing community needs, particularly concerning environmental and social impacts of new developments.

Contention

A particular point of contention highlighted in discussions surrounding AB 3147 is the balance of authority between state mandates and local governance. Proponents believe the bill enables responsible growth by establishing a standardized approach to fees, while opponents fear that it may undermine local control over land-use decisions. The discourse reflects broader tensions between economic development goals and maintaining local governance autonomy in responding to community-specific challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB142

Lead-acid batteries.

CA AB2104

Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Act of 2016.

CA SB1056

Property taxes: welfare exemption: community land trust.

CA AB2677

Information Practices Act of 1977.

CA AB2273

The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act.

CA SB55

California Environmental Quality Act: housing and land use.

CA AB643

Electric Rule 21: interconnection: distributed renewable generation.

CA AB392

Multicultural health.