California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2273

Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
4/25/22  
Report Pass
4/25/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/15/22  

Caption

The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act.

Impact

The act introduces specific requirements for online platforms that target children, including the necessity for businesses to conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment before launching new services. This assessment must address how children's personal information is used and the potential risks involved. Failure to comply can result in substantial penalties, including civil fines ranging from $2,500 for negligent offenses to $7,500 for intentional violations. This legislation is expected to significantly impact how online services operate, particularly in terms of data management practices related to children.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2273, known as the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, aims to enhance the privacy and data security of children using online services. This legislation is a response to existing gaps in protecting children's rights in the digital space, mandating that businesses consider the best interests of children when designing services likely to be accessed by them. Companies must implement strict privacy settings that prioritize children's safety unless they can demonstrate a compelling reason for alternative configurations. This law draws from the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 to establish an agency responsible for its enforcement, ensuring compliance among businesses offering online services to children.

Sentiment

The sentiment among stakeholders regarding AB 2273 appears to be largely supportive, particularly from child advocacy groups who see it as a long-overdue step toward safeguarding children's privacy online. Conversely, some in the tech industry might express concerns about the potential burdens of compliance and the implications for business operations. The emotional appeal of child safety runs strong, yet there is debate over how effectively regulations can balance safety and innovation.

Contention

While the bill is rooted in well-meaning intentions to protect children, it raises questions on the balance between safeguarding privacy and fostering an environment where businesses can thrive. Furthermore, the establishment of the California Children's Data Protection Working Group to oversee and recommend best practices for implementation indicates a proactive approach, yet it invites discussion on how these recommendations will be developed and enforced. There is contention over whether the measures outlined in this act might limit creativity and potential in online services aimed at children.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1194

California Privacy Rights Act of 2020: exemptions: abortion services.

NJ A1879

Concerns social media privacy and data management for children and establishes New Jersey Children's Data Protection Commission.

HI SB2309

Relating To Online Safety For Children.

HI SB2012

Relating To Online Privacy For Children.

IL SB1126

REGULATION-TECH

IL SB0051

AGE-APPROPRIATE DESIGN CODE

IL HB3880

CHILDREN PRIVACY PROTECTION

CA AB896

Foster care: placement transition planning.