California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3164

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/16/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Report Pass
4/19/18  
Report Pass
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Report Pass
5/2/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  

Caption

Satellite wagering: Kern County: Shasta County.

Impact

The bill intends to modernize the regulatory framework governing horse racing and related activities in California, particularly by allowing certain fairs the opportunity to operate satellite wagering facilities. This addition could lead to an increase in the economic viability of these local fairs, which have historically struggled with funding and relevance in the entertainment sector. By enabling satellite wagering, local fairs can potentially attract more visitors and generate revenue that could be reinvested into the community.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3164, introduced by Assembly Member Fong, is designed to amend sections of the Business and Professions Code relating to horse racing and satellite wagering facilities in California. The bill allows the California Horse Racing Board to operate satellite wagering facilities at fairs in Kern and Shasta counties, contingent on the approval from the Department of Food and Agriculture. By facilitating satellite wagering, the bill aims to enhance participation in horse racing and generate additional revenue streams for local fairs.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding AB 3164 appears supportive among members of the legislature, as expressed in voting patterns showing unanimous support with no nays. Stakeholders involved in the horse racing industry might also view this bill positively as a means to enhance the viability of horse racing. However, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of expanded gambling options, especially if local communities express apprehension about their impact on public welfare.

Contention

While the bill garnered broad support, potential contentions may stem from the concerns of community members about the implications of expanded gambling within their localities. Some advocacy groups could argue against the normalization of gambling at fairs, emphasizing the need for protective measures to address potential addiction and other social issues associated with gambling. The debate may also highlight tensions between enhancing economic opportunities through gaming and maintaining the integrity of local events focused on community and family-oriented entertainment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1074

Horse racing.

CA AB1096

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB460

Horse racing: satellite wagering facilities: fairs: funding.

CA AB924

Indian tribes: commercial cannabis activity.

CA AB2284

Horse racing: out-of-state or out-of-country harness or quarter horse races.

CA AB715

Horse racing: fairs and expositions: Special Trust Account for the Rebuilding and Renewal of Fairs.

CA AB2938

Horse racing: satellite wagering: use of license fees: earthquake and animal welfare projects.

CA AB1507

Charter schools: location: resource center.