California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB460

Introduced
2/13/17  
Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
7/3/17  
Refer
7/3/17  
Report Pass
7/11/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
9/7/17  
Refer
9/7/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/15/17  
Passed
10/15/17  

Caption

Horse racing: satellite wagering facilities: fairs: funding.

Impact

The amendments proposed in AB 460 specifically aim to facilitate and streamline the operation of satellite wagering in the northern zone, aligning the regulatory framework with the unique needs of the region. The bill allows fairs to retain an additional 1% from the total amount handled in daily conventional and exotic parimutuel pools, with those funds earmarked for enhancing fair infrastructure and safety. This provision is retroactive to January 1, 2016, indicating an acknowledgment of past operational challenges and an intent to remediate them.

Summary

Assembly Bill 460, which was approved on October 15, 2017, amends the existing Horse Racing Law within the Business and Professions Code. This bill primarily impacts the regulation surrounding satellite wagering facilities, enabling fairs to contract for the management and operation of such facilities in the northern zone. Key changes include the broader authority to form partnerships with multiple racing associations or fairs, thereby enhancing operational flexibility and potential revenue generation for fair events.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 460 appears positive, particularly from those within the racing and fair communities, who view it as a significant boost to state-sanctioned horse racing events and a means to increase funding for fair infrastructures. However, while the bill's support is strong among stakeholders in racing, concerns may arise from those wary of gambling expansion and its societal impacts.

Contention

Points of contention largely center on the potential implications for gambling regulations and how expanded satellite wagering might affect local communities. Critics may argue that increasing access to satellite facilities could exacerbate gambling-related issues, while proponents assert that the bill presents a pragmatic approach to enhancing fairness and competition in the racing industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2284

Horse racing: out-of-state or out-of-country harness or quarter horse races.

CA AB1074

Horse racing.

CA AB351

Reduction of human remains and the disposition of reduced human remains.

CA SB274

Administration of taxes: notice of deficiency assessment.

CA AB1096

Horse racing: minisatellite wagering facilities.

CA AB1173

Horse racing: advance deposit wagering: hub agreement arbitration.

CA AB924

Indian tribes: commercial cannabis activity.

CA AB759

Traffic safety: work zones: positive protection measures.