California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3251

Introduced
3/5/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
6/26/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Passed
9/23/18  

Caption

Sale of armories.

Impact

The legislation amends existing laws regarding the authority to lease and sell armory properties, effectively streamlining the process for state officials. By allowing the Director of General Services greater authority to dispose of armory properties, the state is positioned to optimize its real estate resources. The bill reinforces local government involvement by requiring that local entities be considered for the purchase of armories before opening up sales to the private sector, thus promoting community engagement and accountability in the disposition of state-owned properties.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 3251, also known as AB3251, concerns the sale of armories in California. The bill authorizes the Director of General Services, with the approval of the Adjutant General, to sell specified armories located throughout the state. It stipulates that the proceeds from these sales will be deposited into the established Armory Fund, which is earmarked for specific purposes related to armory management and uses. Notably, the bill ensures that the Sylmar Armory must first be offered to a designated joint powers authority before the sale can proceed to private entities or individuals.

Sentiment

Discussion around AB3251 appears largely neutral, as the bill facilitates necessary operational actions regarding state property and addresses legal processes without inciting significant public opposition or support. Proponents argue that this measure provides essential flexibility in managing surplus armories, while critics have not raised significant contentions regarding the bill itself, suggesting it is a technical response to legal and operational needs within the state government.

Contention

While AB3251 progresses with minimal contention, some stakeholders may express concerns about the implications of selling off public properties that could otherwise serve community needs. The requirement that the Sylmar Armory must first be offered to local authorities such as the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority is a notable point that aims to mitigate potential backlash and maintain a focus on local benefit, ensuring that such sales align with community objectives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB501

Armories: Reedley Armory.

CA SB855

Sale of armories.

CA AB653

State armories.

CA AB1057

Armories: sales: San Diego Armory.

CA AB1977

State real property: surplus.

CA AB1315

Veterans’ homes: lease of property.

CA SB828

Surplus state real property: disposal.