California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB653

Introduced
2/15/19  
Introduced
2/15/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Refer
5/9/19  
Refer
5/9/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Report Pass
6/17/19  
Report Pass
6/17/19  
Refer
6/17/19  
Refer
6/17/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Enrolled
8/22/19  
Chaptered
9/6/19  
Passed
9/6/19  

Caption

State armories.

Impact

The enacted bill modifies the existing laws regarding the leasing and selling of real properties held for armory purposes, especially those designated for military use. Under the provisions of AB 653, the transaction is subject to legislative approval, thereby providing a framework for municipalities to utilize state-owned properties for local housing initiatives. The income generated from these leases will be directed to the Armory Fund, which supports various activities associated with state armories.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 653, sponsored by Assemblymember Bloom, relates to state armories and authorizes the Director of General Services to lease a portion of the West Los Angeles Armory to the County of Los Angeles. The lease is intended for the County's Bridge Housing Program, which aims to provide housing solutions. The bill specifies that the lease can be for a period of five years, with options for four additional five-year extensions, allowing for a maximum cumulative term of 25 years.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 653 appears to be generally supportive, as it facilitates local government initiatives aimed at addressing housing insecurity. The measure has received a majority vote during legislative processes, reflecting a positive reception from lawmakers, particularly regarding the social benefits of utilizing vacant armory facilities to support housing programs.

Contention

Despite the overall support, discussions may arise regarding the allocation of state property and the effectiveness of such housing programs. Some stakeholders might question whether leasing military properties for civilian uses aligns with the original intent of these facilities. The potential for future conflicts over property use and the priorities placed on military versus civilian needs could lead to debates as the bill is implemented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1057

Armories: sales: San Diego Armory.

CA SB501

Armories: Reedley Armory.

CA SB855

Sale of armories.

CA AB3251

Sale of armories.

CA AB2306

Sensitive military land: foreign ownership and interests: prohibited foreign actors.

CA AB948

Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers: disclosures: demographic information: reporting: continuing education.

CA AB240

Veterans’ homes: lease of property.