California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB331

Introduced
2/7/17  
Introduced
2/7/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Report Pass
5/22/17  
Report Pass
5/22/17  
Refer
5/23/17  
Refer
5/23/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/19/17  
Report Pass
6/19/17  
Refer
6/19/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/2/17  
Chaptered
10/2/17  
Passed
10/2/17  

Caption

County recorders: veterans: recorded documents.

Impact

The passage of AB 331 has significant implications for state laws governing the access and handling of public records, particularly regarding veterans' personal information. By transitioning military discharge records into a nonpublic index, the bill creates a more secure environment for sensitive veteran information, balancing the need for public access to information while protecting individual privacy. This is especially crucial given the unique nature of the DD214 form and its importance to veterans in proving their service.

Summary

Assembly Bill 331, introduced by Eggman, focuses on the recording and privacy of military discharge documents, particularly the DD214 form. The bill amends Section 27337 of the Government Code, mandating that county recorders maintain these documents in a nonpublic index when requested by veterans or authorized persons. This change aims to enhance personal privacy for veterans while ensuring their military discharge records are securely stored and accessible only to those authorized to view them.

Sentiment

Reactions to the bill appear to be supportive of the notion that protecting veterans' personal information is paramount. Legislators recognized the importance of ensuring that sensitive information is not publicly accessible, which aligns with growing concerns about privacy in governmental records. The sentiment suggests a consensus on safeguarding veterans while providing them ease in managing their documentation without added public exposure.

Contention

One notable point of contention discussed during the bill's deliberation was the balance between governmental transparency and personal privacy. While advocates pointed out the necessity of protecting veterans' personal information, critics might argue that such measures could lead to reduced public oversight of public records. The bill's legislative findings explicitly address these concerns by stating that protecting personal information does not undermine the public's right to access information necessary for accountability within local government bodies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1357

Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners.

CA SB296

Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners.

CA SB726

Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners.

CA SB23

Property taxation: exemption: disabled veteran homeowners.

CA AB2043

Occupational safety and health: agricultural employers and employees: COVID-19 response.

CA SB767

Sexually exploited children: foster care.

CA SB403

Discrimination on the basis of ancestry.

CA AB3364

Judiciary omnibus.