California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB399

Introduced
2/9/17  
Introduced
2/9/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Autonomous vehicles: Contra Costa Transportation Authority: pilot project.

Impact

Should AB399 be enacted, it would extend the previous authorization for the pilot project from 180 days to an additional 12 months post the onset of DMV regulations regarding driverless vehicle testing. This amendment intends to foster a balance between innovative vehicle technology and California's established safety regulations. The bill signifies legislative support for testing advanced technologies in controlled conditions, reflecting the state's commitment to advancing vehicular automation while ensuring public safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 399, introduced by Assembly Member Grayson, seeks to amend Section 38755 of the Vehicle Code to authorize a pilot project for testing autonomous vehicles without a seated driver. The bill defines an autonomous vehicle as one equipped with technology that allows it to operate without human input. Under current regulations, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority is permitted to conduct testing of such vehicles under specific conditions: the vehicles must operate only within a designated business park and stay below 35 miles per hour, ensuring a controlled environment for testing. Additionally, the authority must provide a detailed testing proposal to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) before commencing operations.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding AB399 reflect a positive sentiment towards technological advancement in transportation. Supporters commend the initiative for encouraging innovation within the state while adhering to safety parameters. There is an acknowledgment that this pilot project could set a precedent for future regulations concerning autonomous vehicles. However, some stakeholders express caution, emphasizing the need for robust safety mechanisms and regulatory oversight to safeguard public welfare while exploring these advances.

Contention

A notable point of contention includes concerns over the adequacy of safety measures in the testing of driverless vehicles. Opponents argue that without rigorous oversight, pilot projects may lead to unforeseen accidents or malfunctions that could jeopardize public safety. The bill mandates comprehensive risk assessments and insurance requirements, with a minimum coverage of five million dollars, yet critics call for more stringent regulations and accountability from testing parties. This ongoing debate encapsulates the broader deliberation between progression and regulation in the realm of autonomous transportation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2286

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB316

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB1777

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB1201

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB3061

Vehicles: autonomous vehicle incident reporting.

CA SB915

Local government: autonomous vehicle service.

CA AB7

Transportation: planning: project selection processes.

CA SB757

Railroads: contract crew transportation vehicles.

CA AB1082

Authority to remove vehicles.

CA AB1188

Transportation: bicycle safety handbook.

Similar Bills

CA AB2638

Autonomous vehicles.

CA SB251

Autonomous vehicles: pilot project.

CA AB1444

Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority: demonstration project.

CA AB87

Vehicles: removal: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB3061

Vehicles: autonomous vehicle incident reporting.

CA AB2286

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB316

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB1777

Autonomous vehicles.