California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2286

Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Report Pass
4/8/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Vetoed
9/27/24  

Caption

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

Impact

The bill posits significant changes to existing vehicle regulations, particularly in elevating safety protocols for the operation of heavier autonomous vehicles. By introducing stringent reporting requirements and specifically mandating a human safety operator's presence during operations, the legislation seeks to minimize risks associated with autonomous vehicle technology. Additionally, the California DMV is tasked with evaluating these technologies' performance and their broader implications on public safety and employment trends in the transportation sector by the year 2030.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2286, introduced by Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Friedman, and Kalra, addresses regulations concerning the operation of autonomous vehicles, specifically targeting those with a gross vehicle weight of 10,001 pounds or more. The bill mandates that manufacturers must report collisions involving their autonomous vehicles within ten days, providing critical information about incidents that result in damage to property, bodily injury, or death. Furthermore, manufacturers are required to submit annual disengagement reports that document instances when the autonomous mode is deactivated, detailing the conditions leading to such disengagements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB 2286 appears to be one of caution and responsibility. Proponents argue that the regulation aims to ensure public safety while fostering the responsible development of autonomous technology. However, there may be concerns within the industry about the potential implications for technological advancement and operational flexibility, given the strict requirement for human oversight during vehicle operation.

Contention

One of the key points of contention surrounds the necessity of having a human safety operator present during the operation of autonomous vehicles. While proponents believe this is essential for safety, critics argue that it could hinder innovation and slow the integration of fully autonomous vehicles into the market. The legislative oversight outlined in the bill also implies ongoing scrutiny of the impacts that autonomous vehicles may have on jobs and transportation infrastructure, which could generate further debate regarding the balance between safety and progress.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB316

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB3061

Vehicles: autonomous vehicle incident reporting.

CA AB2638

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB33

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB1444

Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority: demonstration project.

CA SB251

Autonomous vehicles: pilot project.

CA AB399

Autonomous vehicles: Contra Costa Transportation Authority: pilot project.

MD HB439

Vehicle Laws – Fully Autonomous Vehicles – Human Safety Operators and Reporting Requirements