California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB543

Introduced
2/13/17  
Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Employment: resident apartment manager wages.

Impact

If enacted, AB 543 would impact the wage arrangements for resident apartment managers, specifically allowing employers to account for rental value as part of the wage payment. This bill would broaden the scope of existing law, permitting employers to utilize the full extent of the value of the provided housing when meeting wage obligations, potentially enhancing the financial viability of offering apartment management positions. It also reflects a shift towards accommodating employer flexibility in compensation structures.

Summary

Assembly Bill 543, introduced by Assembly Member Chen, seeks to amend Section 1182.8 of the California Labor Code concerning employee wages for resident apartment managers. The bill proposes an exemption from certain orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission, allowing employers to meet minimum wage obligations by applying a portion of the rental value of an apartment provided to resident managers, even if they charge no rent. This change aims to clarify the regulatory framework governing rental arrangements for staff who oversee apartment complexes.

Sentiment

The discussion around AB 543 appears divided among stakeholders, with proponents arguing that the bill alleviates unnecessary burdens on employers who provide housing for their employees. They assert that this flexibility could help stabilize employment in property management sectors. However, there are concerns among labor advocates who fear the legislation might undermine wage protections and could lead to exploitation of employees working under uncertain financial arrangements.

Contention

Notable contention surrounds the potential for exploitation versus the need for clear regulatory definitions in the collaborative housing-management model. Critics emphasize the importance of maintaining stringent wage standards to prevent any reductions in compensation that might arise if rental values are overemphasized in wage calculations. This debate highlights a fundamental tension in balancing employee protections with employer flexibility in a labor market that is increasingly complex.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1038

Surplus residential property: City of Pasadena: City of South Pasadena.

CA AB3264

Energy: cost framework: residential rates: demand-side management programs report: electrical transmission grid study.

CA AB770

Residential care facilities for the elderly.

CA SB1406

Residential care facilities for the elderly: resident services.

CA AB426

Unlicensed residential foster care facilities: temporary placement management.

CA SB3

Discontinuation of residential water service: covered water system.

CA SB611

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

CA AB2694

Density Bonus Law: residential care facilities for the elderly.

CA AB171

Employment.

CA SB171

Employment.

Similar Bills

CA SB34

Air pollution: South Coast Air Quality Management District: mobile sources: Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.

CA AB612

Worker classification: business-to-business voluntary deposit arrangements.

CA SB273

Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies.

CA SB1052

Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies.

HI HB559

Relating To Transportation.

HI SB755

Relating To Transportation.

WV HB4967

Relating to the administration of the Voluntary Remediation and Redevelopment Act to provide new liability protections for persons and companies who wish to purchase and redevelop former industrial properties.

CA AB1928

Hope California: Secured Residential Treatment Pilot Program.