California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB573

Introduced
2/14/17  
Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Report Pass
3/23/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
1/3/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Refer
1/4/18  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Wild pigs.

Impact

The bill is designed to streamline the process for individuals seeking to manage wild pig populations on their land. Under the existing law, a permit was required to hunt wild pigs, creating hurdles for landowners affected by these animals. With AB573, landowners or their agents can immediately take action against wild pigs that are damaging property without the need for extensive permits. This flexibility is expected to enhance property protection and reduce wild pig-related damage on farms and ranches across California. Additionally, it requires owners of domestic swine that resemble wild pigs to mark these animals, thereby helping to control their populations further and prevent misidentification.

Summary

Assembly Bill 573, introduced by Assembly Member Bigelow, aims to amend various sections of the Fish and Game Code to address issues related to wild pigs' management and take regulations. The bill redefines wild pigs, expanding the definition to include feral pigs and European wild boars, and classifies wild pigs as neither game nor nongame mammals. It eliminates the hunting license and pig tag requirements, replacing them with a validation system that permits hunters to take unlimited wild pigs within a license year upon payment of the required fee. This change is intended to simplify the regulatory framework around wild pig hunting in California and facilitate better control of their populations due to the agricultural and ecological damage they cause.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB573 appears to be largely supportive among agricultural stakeholders and landowners who view the measure as necessary for managing the increasing wild pig populations and addressing the resultant damage. Opponents, including some wildlife protection advocates, may express concerns regarding the potential for overpopulation management practices to lead to unsustainable hunting practices or exacerbate animal welfare issues. However, the debate overall reflects a shared recognition of the challenges posed by wild pigs in the state.

Contention

A notable point of contention includes the replacement of traditional tag-based hunting practices with a validation system, which raises concerns about potential overharvesting and monitoring of wild pig populations. The elimination of immediate take rights previously granted under depredation circumstances has also been a focus of discussion, as stakeholders weigh the benefits of expedited management against potential ecological impacts. Furthermore, the mandatory identification requirements for domestic swine that may resemble wild pigs underscore an ongoing tension between agricultural interests and wildlife conservation efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1760

Fish and Game Code.

CA SB1163

Wildlife-vehicle collisions: wildlife salvage permits.

CA AB64

Beaver restoration.

CA AB2252

Department of Fish and Wildlife: beaver translocation.

CA SB500

Fish and wildlife.

CA SB772

Junior hunting licenses: age of eligibility.

CA AB2196

Beaver restoration.

CA AB3220

Marine resources: Department of Fish and Wildlife: authority: mariculture.

CA AB1889

Conservation element: wildlife and habitat connectivity.

CA SB921

Animal welfare.

Similar Bills

CA AB2805

Wild pigs: validations.

CA SB856

Wild pigs: validations.

CA SB252

Toxicological testing on dogs and cats.

CA AB1254

Bobcats: take prohibition: hunting season: management plan.