California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1254

Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
3/28/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  
Passed
10/12/19  

Caption

Bobcats: take prohibition: hunting season: management plan.

Impact

The bill introduces significant changes to how bobcats are treated under California law, potentially affecting both wildlife management practices and local landowners. By making it unlawful to take bobcats except in limited circumstances—such as through a depredation permit—the bill seeks to enhance the protection of this species while also providing a structured approach for dealing with conflicts between bobcats and agricultural interests. The management plan is to consider factors like population estimates, habitat health, and the impact of climate change on bobcat communities.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1254, authored by Kamlager-Dove, focuses on the regulation of bobcats in California, specifically addressing the prohibition of their hunting, trapping, or taking except under certain conditions. The bill amends the Fish and Game Code to establish a management framework for bobcat populations, necessitating the development of a bobcat management plan to be created in consultation with relevant stakeholders and submitted to the Fish and Game Commission and the Legislature. It sets to align management decisions with scientific evidence and best practices in wildlife conservation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1254 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill promotes conservation and responsible wildlife management, potentially leading to healthier bobcat populations and ecosystems. Conversely, those opposed may feel that the restrictions could hinder local landowners' ability to protect their property from bobcat-related damage, leading to frustrations regarding the management of wildlife interactions. The debate highlights the need for a balance between protecting wildlife and addressing agricultural needs.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the appropriation of funds to initiate a hunting season for bobcats if deemed necessary by the commission, starting in 2025. Critics fear that despite the initial prohibition, this provision could open the door to increased hunting, undermining conservation efforts. Therefore, the effectiveness of the management plan in addressing not only bobcat populations but also public concerns and agricultural interests is central to the discussions about the bill's long-term implications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB573

Wild pigs.

CA AB2805

Wild pigs: validations.

CA SB856

Wild pigs: validations.

CA SB252

Toxicological testing on dogs and cats.