California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB852

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
9/7/17  
Report Pass
9/7/17  
Refer
9/7/17  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  

Caption

Vehicles: child safety.

Impact

The implementation of AB 852 has significant implications for vehicle regulations and child safety laws in California. By empowering school districts to take charge of their safety measures, the bill facilitates enhanced monitoring of driver compliance with traffic laws, particularly during critical student loading and unloading times. The automated systems are designed to provide a clear deterrent against violations, potentially reducing the frequency of incidents involving drivers who bypass stopped school buses, thereby prioritizing the safety of students while they board and exit.

Summary

Assembly Bill 852 aims to enhance child safety on California roadways through the authorization of automated school bus video enforcement systems. Under this bill, school districts are enabled to install and operate these systems to ensure compliance with existing laws that require vehicles to stop when encountering a school bus that is loading or unloading children. The crucial element of this legislation is the creation of additional signage on school buses to inform drivers of the automated enforcement, and the establishment of protocols regarding the use and management of video data captured by these systems.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 852 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for child safety. Proponents argue that the bill addresses a critical issue of child protection in transportation, while simultaneously modernizing enforcement methods. However, there are concerns regarding privacy issues related to the use of automated surveillance technology and the potential for misuse of captured video data. Public discourse reflects a balance between the need for enhanced security and the importance of safeguarding individual rights.

Contention

Contention exists primarily over the privacy implications of implementing automated enforcement systems. While aimed at increasing safety, opponents stress the need for stringent regulations concerning how data is collected, stored, and utilized. The bill mandates that any captured information remains confidential and accessible only for enforcement purposes, but criticism persists over potential breaches of privacy. As school districts prepare to deploy these systems, the challenge lies in addressing public fears while ensuring the efficacy of enforcement measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB371

Schoolbuses: stop requirements.

CA AB3077

Vehicles: bicycle helmets.

CA SB111

Schoolbuses: stop requirements.

CA SB580

Schoolbuses: stop signal arm enforcement system.

CA AB2084

Schoolbuses: stop signal arm enforcement system.

CA AB1111

Pupil transportation: schoolbuses: zero-emission vehicles: extensions: scrapping.

CA AB2480

Zero-emission schoolbus replacement grants: private contractors.

CA AB934

Schoolbuses: video monitoring systems.